Analysis of anastomotic urethroplasty for pelvic fracture urethral distraction defect: Decadal experience from a high-volume tertiary care center
- PMID: 30787576
- PMCID: PMC6362775
- DOI: 10.4103/UA.UA_48_17
Analysis of anastomotic urethroplasty for pelvic fracture urethral distraction defect: Decadal experience from a high-volume tertiary care center
Abstract
Context: Pelvic fracture urethral distraction defect (PFUDD) may be challenging for the treating urologist. Anastomotic urethroplasty is the established surgical procedure for the treatment of PFUDD. Few studies in literature focus purely on PFUDD, and majority of the studies include anterior urethral stricture as well. The period of these studies is relatively short. We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent primary or redo anastomotic urethroplasty for PFUDD over a period of 12 years at a tertiary care center in northern India.
Aims: The aim is to study anastomotic urethroplasty for pelvic fracture urethral distraction defect with regard to long-term success rate and complications.
Settings and design: This was a retrospective study. Subjects and.
Methods: This retrospective study was conducted in the Department of Urology, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, India, from August 2004 to July 2016. All patients who underwent progressive perineal anastomotic repair of PFUDD were included in this study. Demographic findings, type of pelvic fracture, length of distraction defect as per retrograde urethrography (RUG) and micturating cystourethrography, any history of erectile dysfunction in the preoperative or postoperative phase, and urinary incontinence in postoperative phase were analyzed. Decision regarding catheter removal was taken after pericatheter RUG at 4 weeks. Follow-up was done at 3 and 6 months in postoperative period.
Results: A total of 226 anastomotic repairs were done in 221 patients. Of the 221 patients, 51 (23%) were redo urethroplasty. The mean age of patients was 27.6 years. The mean length of distraction defect was 2.7 cm. The mean duration of hospital stay was 6 days. Primary urethroplasty was successful in 163 (93.14%) of 175 patients and redo urethroplasty in 44 (86.27%) of 51 patients. Out of 165 patients, 18 (10.9%) patients reported occasional incontinence while 6 (3.63%) patients reported mild incontinence.
Conclusions: Anastomotic urethroplasty is the definitive procedure for PFUDD. Our success rate for primary deferred anastomotic urethroplasty is 93.14% and for redo anastomotic urethroplasty is 86.27%.
Keywords: Pelvic fracture urethral distraction defect; pelvic trauma; perineal anastomotic urethroplasty; posterior urethral injury.
Conflict of interest statement
There are no conflicts of interest.
Similar articles
-
Current concepts in the management of pelvic fracture urethral distraction defects.Indian J Urol. 2011 Jul;27(3):385-91. doi: 10.4103/0970-1591.85444. Indian J Urol. 2011. PMID: 22022064 Free PMC article.
-
Transperineal anastomotic urethroplasty for pelvic fracture urethral distraction defects: The outcomes of surgical management.Niger J Clin Pract. 2021 Jan;24(1):45-50. doi: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_74_20. Niger J Clin Pract. 2021. PMID: 33473024
-
Delayed surgical repair of posttraumatic posterior urethral distraction defects in children and adolescents: long-term results.J Pediatr Urol. 2015 Apr;11(2):67.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2014.09.010. Epub 2015 Feb 20. J Pediatr Urol. 2015. PMID: 25869826
-
Simple perineal and elaborated perineal posterior urethroplasty.Arab J Urol. 2015 Mar;13(1):17-23. doi: 10.1016/j.aju.2015.01.002. Epub 2015 Mar 9. Arab J Urol. 2015. PMID: 26019973 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Post-traumatic posterior urethral strictures: preoperative decision making.Urology. 2004 Aug;64(2):228-31. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2004.03.019. Urology. 2004. PMID: 15302466 Review.
Cited by
-
Retrospective analysis of urethral anastomosis with ancillary maneuvers and intraoperative biaxial defect measurements to achieve a tension free guidance system for redo PFUDD treatment.BMC Urol. 2024 Apr 9;24(1):82. doi: 10.1186/s12894-024-01456-1. BMC Urol. 2024. PMID: 38594657 Free PMC article.
-
[Outcomes of partial pubectomy assisted anastomotic urethroplasty for male patients with pelvic fracture urethral distraction defect].Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2021 Aug 18;53(4):798-802. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2021.04.030. Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2021. PMID: 34393248 Free PMC article. Chinese.
References
-
- Koraitim MM, Marzouk ME, Atta MA, Orabi SS. Risk factors and mechanism of urethral injury in pelvic fractures. Br J Urol. 1996;77:876–80. - PubMed
-
- Koraitim MM. Pelvic fracture urethral injuries: The unresolved controversy. J Urol. 1999;161:1433–41. - PubMed
-
- Levine JI, Crampton RS. Major abdominal injuries associated with pelvic fractures. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1963;116:223–6. - PubMed
-
- Wilkinson FO. Rupture of the posterior urethra with a review of twelve cases. Lancet. 1961;1:1125–9. - PubMed
-
- Cass AS, Godec CJ. Urethral injury due to external trauma. Urology. 1978;11:607–11. - PubMed