Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Feb;7(1):21-44.
doi: 10.1177/2050640618810242. Epub 2018 Nov 4.

Performance measures for endoscopy services: A European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) quality improvement initiative

Affiliations
Review

Performance measures for endoscopy services: A European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) quality improvement initiative

Roland Valori et al. United European Gastroenterol J. 2019 Feb.

Abstract

The European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and United European Gastroenterology present a list of key performance measures for endoscopy services. We recommend that these performance measures be adopted by all endoscopy services across Europe. The measures include those related to the leadership, organization, and delivery of the service, as well as those associated with the patient journey. Each measure includes a recommendation for a minimum and target standard for endoscopy services to achieve. We recommend that all stakeholders in endoscopy take note of these ESGE endoscopy services performance measures to accelerate their adoption and implementation. Stakeholders include patients and their advocacy groups; service leaders; staff, including endoscopists; professional societies; payers; and regulators.

Keywords: Endoscopy; leadership; patient experience; quality and safety; quality improvement.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Overview of endoscopy services performance measures.

References

    1. Corley DA, Jensen CD, Marks AR. Can we improve adenoma detection rates? A systematic review of intervention studies. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 74: 656–665. - PubMed
    1. Veitch AM, Uedo N, Yao K, et al. Optimizing early upper gastrointestinal cancer detection at endoscopy. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2015; 12: 660–667. - PubMed
    1. Denis B, Gendre I, Sauleau EA, et al. Harms of colonoscopy in a colorectal cancer screening programme with faecal occult blood test: A population-based cohort study. Dig Liver Dis 2013; 45: 474–480. - PubMed
    1. Rutter MD, Senore C, Bisschops R, et al. The European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Quality Improvement Initiative: Developing performance measures. Endoscopy 2016; 48: 81–89. - PubMed
    1. Day LW, Cohen J, Greenwald D, et al. Quality indicators for gastrointestinal endoscopy units. VideoGIE 2017; 2: 119–140. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources