Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Feb;7(1):138-145.
doi: 10.1177/2050640618810572. Epub 2018 Oct 28.

What is the cost of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD)? A medico-economic study

Affiliations

What is the cost of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD)? A medico-economic study

Martin Dahan et al. United European Gastroenterol J. 2019 Feb.

Abstract

Introduction: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is the gold-standard treatment for superficial lesions of the digestive tract. No medico-economic study has been conducted in Europe.

Material and methods: A monocentric study was conducted including all patients undergoing ESD between January 2015 and December 2017. The global cost of hospital stays was measured by microcosting, and revenue was based on the diagnosis-related group (DRG) system. The primary objective was to assess the cost/revenue balance. A medico-economic comparison with surgery was performed as a secondary outcome.

Results: A total of 193 patients were prospectively included. The cost per procedure was €3463.79, subtracted from a €2726.84 revenue, with a deficit of -€736.96 per stay. Presence of comorbidities/complications increasing DRG value was the only predictive factor for a positive budgetary balance in a multivariate analysis (odds ratio 49.21, 95% confidence interval 11.3-214.25, p < 0.0001). In comparison with surgery, ESD was associated with shorter length of stay (11 vs 2 days; p < 0.0001) and lower morbidity (28% vs 14%; p = 0.061), lower cost (€8960 vs €1770; p < 0.0001).

Conclusion: The ESD cost/revenue balance is negative in 80% of cases. Given the benefits of ESD in terms of patient morbidity and financial savings compared with surgery, the implementation of a specific ESD reimbursement is warranted.

Keywords: Colorectal cancer; colorectal surgery; endoscopic submucosal dissection; endoscopy; medico-economic study.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Budgetary balance calculation for endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD).
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Part of expenditure item in the global cost of ESD.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Budgetary balance according to diagnosis-related group.

References

    1. Pimentel-Nunes P, Dinis-Ribeiro M, Ponchon T, et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. Endoscopy 2015; 47: 829–854. - PubMed
    1. Fuccio L, Hassan C, Ponchon T, et al. Clinical outcomes after endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal neoplasia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 2017; 86: 74–86.e17. - PubMed
    1. Patel N, Patel K, Ashrafian H, et al. Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: Systematic review of mid-term clinical outcomes. Dig Endosc 2016; 28: 405–416. - PubMed
    1. Overwater A, Kessels K, Elias SG, et al. Endoscopic resection of high-risk T1 colorectal carcinoma prior to surgical resection has no adverse effect on long-term outcomes. Gut 2018; 67: 284–290. - PubMed
    1. Gamaleldin M, Benlice C, Delaney CP, et al. Management of the colorectal polyp referred for resection: A case-matched comparison of advanced endoscopic surgery and laparoscopic colectomy. Surgery 2018; 163: 522–527. - PubMed