Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Feb 21;6(2):e11517.
doi: 10.2196/11517.

Believing Is Seeing: A Proof-of-Concept Semiexperimental Study on Using Mobile Virtual Reality to Boost the Effects of Interpretation Bias Modification for Anxiety

Affiliations

Believing Is Seeing: A Proof-of-Concept Semiexperimental Study on Using Mobile Virtual Reality to Boost the Effects of Interpretation Bias Modification for Anxiety

Boris Otkhmezuri et al. JMIR Ment Health. .

Abstract

Background: Cognitive Bias Modification of Interpretations (CBM-I) is a computerized intervention designed to change negatively biased interpretations of ambiguous information, which underlie and reinforce anxiety. The repetitive and monotonous features of CBM-I can negatively impact training adherence and learning processes.

Objective: This proof-of-concept study aimed to examine whether performing a CBM-I training using mobile virtual reality technology (virtual reality Cognitive Bias Modification of Interpretations [VR-CBM-I]) improves training experience and effectiveness.

Methods: A total of 42 students high in trait anxiety completed 1 session of either VR-CBM-I or standard CBM-I training for performance anxiety. Participants' feelings of immersion and presence, emotional reactivity to a stressor, and changes in interpretation bias and state anxiety, were assessed.

Results: The VR-CBM-I resulted in greater feelings of presence (P<.001, d=1.47) and immersion (P<.001, ηp2=0.74) in the training scenarios and outperformed the standard training in effects on state anxiety (P<.001, ηp2=0.3) and emotional reactivity to a stressor (P=.03, ηp2=0.12). Both training varieties successfully increased the endorsement of positive interpretations (P<.001, drepeated measures [drm]=0.79) and decreased negative ones. (P<.001, drm=0.72). In addition, changes in the emotional outcomes were correlated with greater feelings of immersion and presence.

Conclusions: This study provided first evidence that (1) the putative working principles underlying CBM-I trainings can be translated into a virtual environment and (2) virtual reality holds promise as a tool to boost the effects of CMB-I training for highly anxious individuals while increasing users' experience with the training application.

Keywords: anxiety; cognitive bias modification; emotional reactivity; head mounted display; immersion; interpretation bias; presence; virtual reality.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Representation of the standard Cognitive Bias Modification of Interpretation (CBM-I) and virtual reality Cognitive Bias Modification of Interpretation (VR-CBM-I) trainings: (A) Standard CBM-I training; (B) VR-CBM-I training (participant’s point of view on the computer room virtual environment on the top right corner); (C) Examples of virtual environments: classroom on the left side, living room in the middle, and book shop on the right side.
Figure 2
Figure 2
(A) Mean (and SE) state anxiety scores from pre to post-training for the virtual reality Cognitive Bias Modification of Interpretation (VR-CBM-I) and standard Cognitive Bias Modification of Interpretation (CBM-I) groups. (B) Mean (and SE) VAS anxiety scores from pre- to post-stressor for the VR-CBM-I condition and standard CBM-I condition.

References

    1. Beck AT, Clark DA. An information processing model of anxiety: automatic and strategic processes. Behaviour Research and Therapy. 1997 Jan;35(1):49–58. doi: 10.1016/S0005-7967(96)00069-1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mathews A, MacLeod C. Cognitive vulnerability to emotional disorders. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2005 Apr;1:167–95. doi: 10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.1.102803.143916. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hirsch CR, Meeten F, Krahé C, Reeder C. Resolving ambiguity in emotional disorders: the nature and role of interpretation biases. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2016 Mar;12:281–305. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-021815-093436. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mathews A, Mackintosh B. Induced emotional interpretation bias and anxiety. J Abnorm Psychol. 2000;109(4):602–15. doi: 10.1037/0021-843X.109.4.602. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hirsch C R, Mathews A. Impaired positive inferential bias in social phobia. J Abnorm Psychol. 2000 Nov;109(4):705–12. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources