Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2019 May 1;5(5):681-688.
doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.6993.

Measuring the Integration of Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy Plus Surgery for Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Phase 2 Clinical Trial

David A Palma  1   2 , Timothy K Nguyen  1   3 , Alexander V Louie  1   2   3 , Richard Malthaner  4 , Dalilah Fortin  4 , George B Rodrigues  1   2 , Brian Yaremko  1   2 , Joanna Laba  1   2 , Keith Kwan  5 , Stewart Gaede  2   6   7 , Ting Lee  2   6 , Aaron Ward  2   6 , Andrew Warner  1 , Richard Inculet  4
Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Measuring the Integration of Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy Plus Surgery for Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Phase 2 Clinical Trial

David A Palma et al. JAMA Oncol. .

Abstract

Importance: Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) is a standard treatment option in patients with medically inoperable early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), yet the pathologic complete response (pCR) rate after SABR is unknown. Neoadjuvant SABR in patients with cancer who are fit for resection has been hypothesized to improve local control and induce antitumor immune activity, potentially leading to better outcomes.

Objectives: To determine the pCR rate after SABR and to assess oncologic and toxicity outcomes after a combined approach of neoadjuvant SABR followed by surgery.

Design, setting, and participants: A phase 2, single-arm trial, with patient accrual from September 30, 2014, to August 15, 2017 (median follow-up, 19 months), was performed at a tertiary academic cancer center. Patients 18 years or older with T1T2N0M0 NSCLC and good performance status, with adequate pulmonary reserve to undergo surgical resection, were studied.

Interventions: Patients underwent neoadjuvant SABR using a risk-adapted fractionation scheme followed by surgery 10 weeks later.

Main outcomes and measures: The pCR rate as determined by hematoxylin-eosin staining.

Results: Forty patients (mean [SD] age, 68 [8] years; 23 [58%] female) were enrolled. Thirty-five patients underwent surgery and were evaluable for the primary end point. The pCR rate was 60% (95% CI, 44%-76%). The 30- and 90-day postoperative mortality rates were both 0%. Grade 3 or 4 toxic effects occurred in 7 patients (18%). In patients receiving surgery, 2-year overall survival was 77% (95% CI, 48%-91%), local control was 100% (95% CI, not defined), regional control was 53% (95% CI, 22%-76%), and distant control was 76% (95% CI, 45%-91%). Quality of life did not decline after treatment, with no significant changes in mean Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy for Lung-Trial Outcome Index score during the first year of follow-up.

Conclusions and relevance: The pCR rate after SABR for early-stage NSCLC was 60%, lower than hypothesized. The combined approach had toxic effects comparable to series of surgery alone, and there was no perioperative mortality. Further studies are needed to evaluate this combined approach compared with surgical resection alone.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02136355.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Louie has received honoraria from Varian Medical Systems Inc and AstraZeneca, unrelated to this research project. Drs Palma and Ward hold a US patent for a computed tomography method of assessing response after radiation therapy (no licensing or commercialization). No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Study Flowchart
pCR indicates pathologic complete response; SABR, stereotactic ablative radiotherapy.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Kaplan-Meier Plots for All 40 Patients
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

References

    1. Senthi S, Lagerwaard FJ, Haasbeek CJ, Slotman BJ, Senan S. Patterns of disease recurrence after stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for early stage non-small-cell lung cancer: a retrospective analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13(8):802-809. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(12)70242-5 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fakiris AJ, McGarry RC, Yiannoutsos CT, et al. . Stereotactic body radiation therapy for early-stage non-small-cell lung carcinoma: four-year results of a prospective phase II study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009;75(3):677-682. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.11.042 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Timmerman RD, Paulus R, Pass HI, et al. . Stereotactic body radiation therapy for operable early-stage lung cancer: findings from the NRG Oncology RTOG 0618 Trial. JAMA Oncol. 2018;4(9):1263-1266. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.1251 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Timmerman RD, Hu C, Michalski JM, et al. . Long-term results of stereotactic body radiation therapy in medically inoperable stage I non–small cell lung cancer. JAMA Oncol. 2018;4(9):1287-1288. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.1258 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chang JY, Senan S, Paul MA, et al. . Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy versus lobectomy for operable stage I non-small-cell lung cancer: a pooled analysis of two randomised trials. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16(6):630-637. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(15)70168-3 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data