Explaining the Process of Determining Futility Increases Lay Public Acceptance
- PMID: 30789785
- PMCID: PMC6543468
- DOI: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201811-790OC
Explaining the Process of Determining Futility Increases Lay Public Acceptance
Abstract
Rationale: National guidelines have laid out a process to conflict resolution in cases of potentially inappropriate medical interventions. Objectives: To determine the association between information about a process-based approach and lay public perceptions of the appropriateness of withholding medically inappropriate interventions. Methods: Respondents from a nationwide sample completed a survey with two adult intensive care unit-based vignettes: one about advanced cancer where doctors told the family that additional chemotherapy would not be offered, and a second case of multiorgan failure after brain hemorrhage where dialysis would not be offered. Participants were randomly assigned to see or not see information about a detailed process for the determination to withhold (second opinion, ethics consultation, exploring transfer to another institution). The primary outcome was the perceived appropriateness of not providing the treatment (four-point scale, dichotomized for analysis, modified Poisson regression), and the secondary outcome was the negative emotional reaction to the case (positive and negative affect schedule, range 1-5, higher is greater negative emotional response, linear regression). Results: A total of 1,191 respondents were included. Providing detailed process information increased the perceived appropriateness of withholding treatment by approximately 10 percentage points in each vignette: (chemotherapy, 75.7-85.4%; dialysis, 68.0-79.3%). Process information remained associated with perceived appropriateness of withholding treatment after adjustment for order effects and prespecified respondent characteristics (chemotherapy: prevalence ratio, 1.13; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.07-1.19) (dialysis: prevalence ratio, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.10-1.25). Process information was not associated with emotional response to the cases (chemotherapy: β = -0.04; 95% CI, -0.16 to 0.09) (dialysis: β = -0.02; 95% CI, -0.14 to 0.10; both adjusted for order effects). Conclusions: Providing process-based conflict resolution information increased public acceptance of determinations of medical futility, supporting the practice outlined in national consensus statements.
Keywords: ethics committees; medical futility; withholding treatment.
Comment in
-
The Importance of Showing Our Work: Process Transparency in Dispute Resolution.Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2019 Jun;16(6):679-680. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201903-254ED. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2019. PMID: 31149855 No abstract available.
References
-
- Bilefsky D.Charlie Gard dies, leaving a legacy of thorny ethics questions. New York Times 2017. 2017 [accessed 2018 Jun 19]. Available from: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/07/28/world/europe/charlie-gard-dead.html
-
- The Case of Baby K. N Engl J Med. 1994;331:1383–1385. - PubMed
-
- Truog RD, White DB. Futile treatments in intensive care units. JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173:1894–1895. - PubMed
-
- Burns JP, Truog RD. Futility: a concept in evolution. Chest. 2007;132:1987–1993. - PubMed
-
- Bosslet GT, Pope TM, Rubenfeld GD, Lo B, Truog RD, Rushton CH, et al. American Thoracic Society ad hoc Committee on Futile and Potentially Inappropriate Treatment; American Thoracic Society; American Association for Critical Care Nurses; American College of Chest Physicians; European Society for Intensive Care Medicine; Society of Critical Care. An official ATS/AACN/ACCP/ESICM/SCCM policy statement: Responding to requests for potentially inappropriate treatments in intensive care units. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015;191:1318–1330. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources