Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 May;92(1097):20181044.
doi: 10.1259/bjr.20181044. Epub 2019 Mar 5.

Imaging strategies in the management of gastric cancer: current role and future potential of MRI

Affiliations
Review

Imaging strategies in the management of gastric cancer: current role and future potential of MRI

Alicia S Borggreve et al. Br J Radiol. 2019 May.

Abstract

Accurate preoperative staging of gastric cancer and the assessment of tumor response to neoadjuvant treatment is of importance for treatment and prognosis. Current imaging techniques, mainly endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS), computed tomography (CT) and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18F-FDG PET), have their limitations. Historically, the role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in gastric cancer has been limited, but with the continuous technical improvements, MRI has become a more potent imaging technique for gastrointestinal malignancies. The accuracy of MRI for T- and N-staging of gastric cancer is similar to EUS and CT, making MRI a suitable alternative to other imaging strategies. There is limited evidence on the performance of MRI for M-staging of gastric cancer specifically, but MRI is widely used for diagnosing liver metastases and shows potential for diagnosing peritoneal seeding. Recent pilot studies showed that treatment response assessment as well as detection of lymph node metastases and systemic disease might benefit from functional MRI (e.g. diffusion weighted imaging and dynamic contrast enhancement). Regarding treatment guidance, additional value of MRI might be expected from its role in better defining clinical target volumes and setup verification with MR-guided radiation treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: The authors report no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Axial T 2 weighted magnetic resonance images (A) and corresponding high signal on diffusion-weighted images (b = 800 s/mm²) (B) of the primary gastric tumor and pathologic lymph node (red marking), as well as a coronal T 2 weighted magnetic resonance image in one patient with cT3N1 gastric adenocarcinoma (C).
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Preoperative dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) magnetic resonance images in axial plane approximately 1.25 min after intravenous contrast injection of two patients with gastric cancer (A and B). Figure B shows increased motion-related artifacts compared to Figure A.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Preoperative T 2-weighted magnetic resonance images in axial planes with pathologic lymph nodes (red markings) in one patient with gastric cancer.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Preoperative T 2-weighted magnetic resonance images (A) and planning CT images (B) of one patient with gastric cancer in axial planes. The red contouring reflects the clinical target volume (CTV) that could be used for preoperative radiation therapy.

References

    1. Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Ervik M, et al . GLOBOCAN 2012 v1.0, Cancer Incidence and Mortality Worldwide: IARC CancerBase No. 11. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer . 2013. . Available from: http://globocan.iarc.fr [ July 27, 2017 ].
    1. Japanese Gastric Cancer Association . Japanese Gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2014 (VER. 4) . Gastric Cancer 2017. ; 20 : 1 – 19 . doi: 10.1007/s10120-016-0622-4 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Macdonald JS , Smalley SR , Benedetti J , Hundahl SA , Estes NC , Stemmermann GN , et al. . Chemoradiotherapy after surgery compared with surgery alone for adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastroesophageal junction . N Engl J Med 2001. ; 345 : 725 – 30 . doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa010187 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cunningham D , Allum WH , Stenning SP , Thompson JN , Van de Velde CJH , Nicolson M , et al. . Perioperative chemotherapy versus surgery alone for resectable gastroesophageal cancer . N Engl J Med 2006. ; 355 : 11 – 20 . doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa055531 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ychou M , Boige V , Pignon J-P , Conroy T , Bouché O , Lebreton G , et al. . Perioperative chemotherapy compared with surgery alone for resectable gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma: an FNCLCC and FFCD multicenter phase III trial . J Clin Oncol 2011. ; 29 : 1715 – 21 . doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.33.0597 - DOI - PubMed