Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 May;31(3):285-292.
doi: 10.1097/BOR.0000000000000598.

Prediction of infection risk in rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with biologics: are we any closer to risk stratification?

Affiliations
Review

Prediction of infection risk in rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with biologics: are we any closer to risk stratification?

Meghna Jani et al. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2019 May.

Abstract

Purpose of review: There are currently several available biologics for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with similar efficacy in most trials. A major consideration therefore in choosing a biologic, continues to be safety concerns such as infection. Considerable advances have been made in the understanding of biologic safety on a population level; however, how close are we to stratifying risk for individual patients? This review discusses evidence published in the last year, with reference to key previous literature.

Recent findings: Comparative safety of biologics has been studied in observational cohorts, with a possible increased risk of serious infection in tocilizumab-treated patients compared with etanercept. Rheumatoid arthritis patients on biologics are often on concomitant medications such as steroids and opioids, and the advances in relation to infection are summarized. Pharmacological biomarkers and optimizing existing risk prediction scores may allow better future risk stratification.

Summary: Improved quantification of personalized benefit:harms would allow better-informed decisions, reduction of infection-associated morbidity as well as direct/indirect costs associated with biologics. Although advances have been made to better understand and predict risk, future studies are likely to require a range of novel data sources and methodologies for the goal of precision medicine to be truly realized.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Box 1
Box 1
no caption available

References

    1. Hazlewood GS, Bombardier C, Tomlinson G, et al. Treatment preferences of patients with early rheumatoid arthritis: a discrete-choice experiment. Rheumatology 2016; 55:1959–1968. - PubMed
    1. Subesinghe S, Rutherford AI, Ibrahim F, et al. A large two-centre study in to rates of influenza and pneumococcal vaccination and infection burden in rheumatoid arthritis in the UK. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2016; 17:322. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jinno S, Lu N, Jafarzadeh SR, et al. Trends in hospitalizations for serious infections in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in the US between 1993 and 2013. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2018; 70:652–658. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Walkey AJ, Lagu T, Lindenauer PK. Trends in sepsis and infection sources in the United States. A population-based study. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2015; 12:216–220. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Askling J, Dixon W. The safety of antitumour necrosis factor therapy in rheumatoid arthritis. Curr Opin Rheumatol 2008; 20:138–144. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms