Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2019 Feb 21;14(2):e0212396.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0212396. eCollection 2019.

A comparison of trends in stroke care and outcomes between in-hospital and community-onset stroke - The South London Stroke Register

Eva S Emmett  1 , Abdel Douiri  1   2 , Iain J Marshall  1 , Charles D A Wolfe  1   2   3 , Anthony G Rudd  1   2   3   4 , Ajay Bhalla  1   2   4
Affiliations
Comparative Study

A comparison of trends in stroke care and outcomes between in-hospital and community-onset stroke - The South London Stroke Register

Eva S Emmett et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: Stroke care and outcomes have improved significantly over the past decades. It is unclear if patients who had a stroke in hospital (in-hospital stroke, IHS) experienced similar improvements to those who were admitted with stroke (community-onset stroke, COS).

Methods: Data from the South London Stroke Register were analysed to estimate trends in processes of care and outcomes across three cohorts (1995-2001, 2002-2008, 2009-2015). Kaplan-Meier survival curves were calculated for each cohort. Associations between patient location at stroke onset, processes of care, and outcomes were investigated using multiple logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models.

Results: Of 5,119 patients admitted to hospital and registered between 1995 and 2015, 552(10.8%) had IHS. Brain imaging rates increased from 92.4%(COS) and 78.3%(IHS) in 1995-2001 to 100% for COS and IHS in 2009-2015. Rates of stroke unit admission rose but remained lower for IHS (1995-2001: 32.2%(COS) vs. 12.4%(IHS), 2002-2008: 77.1%(COS) vs. 50.0%(IHS), 2009-2015: 86.3%(COS) vs. 65.4%(IHS)). After adjusting for patient characteristics and case-mix, IHS was independently associated with lower rates of stroke unit admission in each cohort (1995-2001: OR 0.49, 95%CI 0.29-0.82, 2002-2008: 0.29, 0.18-0.45, 2009-2015: 0.22, 0.11-0.43). In 2009-2015, thrombolysis rates were lower for ischaemic IHS (17.8%(COS) vs. 13.8%(IHS)). Despite a decline, in-hospital mortality remained significantly higher after IHS in 2009-2015 (13.7%(COS) vs. 26.7%(IHS)). Five-year mortality rates declined for COS from 58.9%(1995-2001) to 35.2%(2009-2015) and for IHS from 80.8%(1995-2001) to 51.1%(2009-2015). In multivariable analysis, IHS was associated with higher mortality over five years post-stroke in each cohort (1995-2001: HR 1.27, 95%CI 1.03-1.57, 2002-2008: 1.24, 0.99-1.55, 2009-2016: 1.39, 0.95-2.04).

Conclusions: Despite significant improvements for IHS patients similar to those for COS patients, rates of stroke unit admission and thrombolysis remain lower, and short- and long-term outcomes poorer after IHS. Factors preventing IHS patients from entering evidence-based stroke-specific hospital pathways in a timely fashion need further investigation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Proportion of dead, severely/moderately disabled (BI<15), or mildly/not disabled (BI≥15) patients.
Abbreviations: BI Barthel Index.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates over 5 years following stroke.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Royal College of Physicians. Sentinel Stroke National Audit Programme (SSNAP) Clinical audit August-November 2016 Public Report National Results. London: Royal College of Physicians, 2017.
    1. Cumbler E, Wald H, Bhatt DL, Cox M, Xian Y, Reeves M, et al. Quality of care and outcomes for in-hospital ischemic stroke: findings from the National Get With The Guidelines-Stroke. Stroke. 2014;45(1):231–8. Epub 2013/11/21. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.003617 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Schurmann K, Nikoubashman O, Falkenburger B, Tauber SC, Wiesmann M, Schulz JB, et al. Risk profile and treatment options of acute ischemic in-hospital stroke. J Neurol. 2016;263(3):550–7. Epub 2016/01/15. 10.1007/s00415-015-8010-2 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bunch ME, Nunziato EC, Labovitz DL. Barriers to the use of intravenous tissue plasminogen activator for in-hospital strokes. Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases: the official journal of National Stroke Association. 2012;21(8):808–11. Epub 2011/06/07. 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2011.04.012 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Farooq MU, Reeves MJ, Gargano J, Wehner S, Hickenbottom S, Majid A. In-hospital stroke in a statewide stroke registry. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2008;25(1–2):12–20. Epub 2007/11/24. 10.1159/000111494 . - DOI - PubMed

Publication types