Prediction of live birth and cumulative live birth rates in freeze-all-IVF treatment of a general population
- PMID: 30790147
- PMCID: PMC6504993
- DOI: 10.1007/s10815-019-01422-z
Prediction of live birth and cumulative live birth rates in freeze-all-IVF treatment of a general population
Abstract
Purpose: To investigate the cumulative live birth (cLB) rate of one complete freeze-all-IVF cycle in a general infertile population and to investigate patient and treatment variables that predict blastocyst development and live birth (LB).
Method: In a retrospective observational study, the data of all IVF cycles performed between 1 February 2015 and 31 January 2016 at a single IVF centre was investigated. In the study, patient-couples were followed up for 18 months following oocyte retrieval. After exclusions, the patient and treatment variables of 1582 patient-couples who underwent treatment were included in the analyses.
Results: The median time interval between the oocyte retrieval attempt and the frozen embryo transfer (FET) in which LB was achieved was 38.0 (35.0-67.0) days. The variables of freeze-all-IVF cycles with single blastocyst FET selected by multiple logistic regression to predict LB significantly were female age, infertility duration, FET number (i.e. 1st, 2nd, or ≥ 3rd FET), and blastocyst quality. In a regression adjusting for female age, the number of blastocysts transferred, and oocyte number group (1-3, 4-9, 10-15, and > 15), none of the oocyte number groups were selected to predict LB of 1st FET, significantly. While the per transfer LB rates decreased linearly from the 1st (56.5%) to the 3rd (36.4%) FET, the cLB rate increased from 47.3% after the 1st FET to 55.0% after a 3rd possible FET.
Conclusion: The cLB rate of one complete freeze-all-IVF cycle of a general infertile population, with 18-month follow-up, was 55.0%. In freeze-all-IVF, ovarian reserve variables were not selected by regression models to predict LB, significantly.
Keywords: Blastocyst; Cumulative live birth, freeze-all; Frozen embryo transfer; Live birth; Vitrification.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
References
-
- Practice Committee of American Society for Reproductive Medicine Gonadotropin preparations: past, present, and future perspectives. Fertil Steril. 2008;90:S13–S20. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical