Hemodynamic characterization of aortic stenosis states
- PMID: 30790429
- DOI: 10.1002/ccd.28146
Hemodynamic characterization of aortic stenosis states
Abstract
Aortic stenosis (AS) has become an increasingly prevalent clinical condition, as a result of the "greying of the population", the widespread application of sophisticated diagnostic tools including non-invasive imaging and invasive techniques, and the advent of minimally invasive surgical and percutaneous valve therapies. The diagnosis of severe AS traditionally has relied on the assessment of the mean transvalvular gradient (ΔPmean ) and aortic valve area (AVA) by either echocardiography or catheterization. However, other hemodynamic variables as flow, pressure recovery, and jet eccentricity also play a major role in determining the final hemodynamic state of AS. Moreover, mismatch between ΔPmean and AVA as in low flow low gradient AS and discordance between catheterization and echocardiographic studies in grading severity of AS have increased the complexity of AS diagnosis. The present case-based treatise emphasizes a multi-modality approach to delineation of the hemodynamic pathophysiology of different AS states. KEY POINTS: Reduction in the aortic valve area, flow across the aortic valve, and direction of the aortic stenosis jet determine the pressure gradient generated across the aortic valve in patients with aortic stenosis. Discordance between echo and catheterization maximum gradients is related to the inherent temporal differences between the times of their acquisition. Discordance between echo and catheterization mean gradients is related to pressure recovery and assumptions in the application of Bernoulli equation to estimate the aortic valve gradient. Pressure recovery relates to the ratio of the aortic valve area and ascending aortic diameter as well as the jet direction. Mismatch between area and gradient criteria for aortic stenosis severity may occur with or without concordance between echocardiographic and catheterization data. Errors of measurement should be excluded prior to assuming any mismatch or discordance between the data. Area gradient mismatch occurs when the aortic valve area is in the severe range, while the gradient is in the non-severe range as in low flow low gradient aortic stenosis. Reverse area gradient mismatch occurs when the gradient is in the severe range, while the aortic valve area is in the non-severe range as in congenital aortic stenosis with an eccentric jet.
Keywords: ECHO/CATH discordance; area/gradient mismatch; eccentric jet; low flow/low gradient AS; reverse area/gradient mismatch.
© 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Similar articles
-
Jet eccentricity: a misleading source of agreement between Doppler/catheter pressure gradients in aortic stenosis.J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2001 Sep;14(9):853-62. doi: 10.1067/mje.2001.113648. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2001. PMID: 11547270
-
Aortic valve area discrepancy by Gorlin equation and Doppler echocardiography continuity equation: relationship to flow in patients with valvular aortic stenosis.Can J Cardiol. 2000 Aug;16(8):985-92. Can J Cardiol. 2000. PMID: 10978934
-
Hemodynamic principles of prosthetic aortic valve evaluation in the transcatheter aortic valve replacement era.Echocardiography. 2020 May;37(5):738-757. doi: 10.1111/echo.14663. Epub 2020 May 3. Echocardiography. 2020. PMID: 32362021 Review.
-
Simultaneous Doppler/catheter measurements of pressure gradients in aortic valve disease: a correction to the Bernoulli equation based on velocity decay in the stenotic jet.J Heart Valve Dis. 2000 Mar;9(2):291-8. J Heart Valve Dis. 2000. PMID: 10772051
-
Cardiac Imaging for Assessing Low-Gradient Severe Aortic Stenosis.JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017 Feb;10(2):185-202. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2017.01.002. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017. PMID: 28183438 Review.
Cited by
-
Surgical aortic valve replacement etiologies, hemodynamics, and outcomes in 1346 patients from the Malaysian heart centre.J Cardiothorac Surg. 2024 Jan 2;19(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s13019-023-02472-2. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2024. PMID: 38167451 Free PMC article.
-
Aortic Stenosis: Haemodynamic Benchmark and Metric Reliability Study.J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2023 Aug;16(4):862-873. doi: 10.1007/s12265-022-10350-w. Epub 2023 Feb 6. J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2023. PMID: 36745287 Free PMC article.
-
Multimodality Imaging for Discordant Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis: Assessing the Valve and the Myocardium.Front Cardiovasc Med. 2020 Dec 3;7:570689. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2020.570689. eCollection 2020. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2020. PMID: 33344514 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Outcome of transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients over 85 years of age versus patients aged 85 and younger.Neth Heart J. 2022 Oct;30(10):473-478. doi: 10.1007/s12471-022-01693-9. Epub 2022 May 24. Neth Heart J. 2022. PMID: 35608812 Free PMC article.
-
Personalized intervention cardiology with transcatheter aortic valve replacement made possible with a non-invasive monitoring and diagnostic framework.Sci Rep. 2021 May 25;11(1):10888. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-85500-2. Sci Rep. 2021. PMID: 34035325 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials