Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Mar;13(2):e1800113.
doi: 10.1002/prca.201800113.

The Case for Proteomics and Phospho-Proteomics in Personalized Cancer Medicine

Affiliations
Review

The Case for Proteomics and Phospho-Proteomics in Personalized Cancer Medicine

Sophia Doll et al. Proteomics Clin Appl. 2019 Mar.

Abstract

The concept of personalized medicine is predominantly been pursued through genomic and transcriptomic technologies, leading to the identification of multiple mutations in a large variety of cancers. However, it has proven challenging to distinguish driver and passenger mutations and to deal with tumor heterogeneity and resistant clonal populations. More generally, these heterogeneous mutation patterns do not in themselves predict the tumor phenotype. Analysis of the expressed proteins in a tumor and their modification states reveals if and how these mutations are translated to the functional level. It is already known that proteomic changes including posttranslational modifications are crucial drivers of oncogenesis, but proteomics technology has only recently become comparable in depth and accuracy to RNAseq. These advances also allow the rapid and highly sensitive analysis of formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded biobank tissues, on both the proteome and phosphoproteome levels. In this perspective, pioneering mass spectrometry-based proteomic studies are highlighted that pave the way toward clinical implementation. It is argued that proteomics and phosphoproteomics could provide the missing link to make omics analysis actionable in the clinic.

Keywords: clinical proteomics; mass spectrometry; oncology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
MS‐based proteomic workflow. Cancer samples, such as FFPE tissues, blood plasma, or cells are analyzed using automated sample preparation methods and analyzed by high resolution MS. The generated proteomic data are analyzed using sophisticated but automated bioinformatic workflows resulting in a set of several thousand identified and quantified proteins.
Figure 2
Figure 2
A multi‐level proteomics approach uncovers CT45 as a prognostic biomarker in ovarian cancer and sheds light on its biological role.[75]
Figure 3
Figure 3
Panomics‐based approach integrating genomic, transcriptomic, and proteomic data with clinical data to better identify therapeutic treatments for cancer patients.

References

    1. Mukherjee S. The Emperor of All Maladies, Scribner, NY: 2010.
    1. WHO Cancer http://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/cancer (accessed: November 2018).
    1. DNA Sequencing costs (accessed: June 2018). www.Genome.Gov
    1. Hutter C., Zenklusen J. C. Cell 2018, 173, 283. - PubMed
    1. International Cancer Genome Consortium , et al. Nature 2010, 464, 993. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances

LinkOut - more resources