Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2019 Feb 20;11(2):442.
doi: 10.3390/nu11020442.

Effects of Vitamin D Supplementation During Pregnancy on Birth Size: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Effects of Vitamin D Supplementation During Pregnancy on Birth Size: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Andrea Maugeri et al. Nutrients. .

Abstract

During pregnancy, vitamin D supplementation may be a feasible strategy to help prevent low birthweight (LBW) and small for gestational age (SGA) births. However, evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) is inconclusive, probably due to heterogeneity in study design and type of intervention. A systematic literature search in the PubMed-Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases was carried out to evaluate the effects of oral vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy on birthweight, birth length, head circumference, LBW, and SGA. The fixed-effects or random-effects models were used to calculate mean difference (MD), risk ratio (RR), and 95% Confidence Interval (CI). On a total of 13 RCTs, maternal vitamin D supplementation had a positive effect on birthweight (12 RCTs; MD = 103.17 g, 95% CI 62.29⁻144.04 g), length (6 RCTs; MD = 0.22 cm, 95% CI 0.11⁻0.33 cm), and head circumference (6 RCTs; MD:0.19 cm, 95% CI 0.13⁻0.24 cm). In line with these findings, we also demonstrated that maternal vitamin D supplementation reduced the risk of LBW (3 RCTs; RR = 0.40, 95% CI 0.22⁻0.74) and SGA (5 RCTS; RR = 0.69, 95% CI 0.51⁻0.92). The present systematic review and meta-analysis confirmed the well-established effect of maternal vitamin D supplementation on birth size. However, further research is required to better define risks and benefits associated with such interventions and the potential implications for public health.

Keywords: birth length; birthweight; diet; gestational age; head circumference; nutrition; pregnancy outcomes; vitamin D.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA flow diagram of study selection.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Forest plot of the effect of vitamin D intervention alone or in combination with micronutrients on birthweight (g), based on the fixed-effects model. Charandabi 2015 (a): Vit D + Ca (1000 IU/day); Charandabi 2015 (b): Vit D (1000 IU/day); Goldring 2013 (a): Vit D2 (800 IU/day); Goldring 2013 (b): Vit D3 (single dose of 200000 IU); Hollis 2011 (a): Vit D3 + micronutrients (1600 IU/day); Hollis 2011 (b): Vit D3 + micronutrients (3600 IU/day).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Forest plot of the effect of vitamin D intervention alone or in combination with micronutrients on birth length (cm), based on the fixed-effects model. Charandabi 2015 (a): Vit D + Ca (1000 IU/day); Charandabi 2015 (b): Vit D (1000 IU/day).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Forest plot of the effect of vitamin D intervention alone or in combination with micronutrients on head circumference (cm), based on the fixed-effects model. Charandabi 2015 (a): Vit D + Ca (1000 IU/day); Charandabi 2015 (b): Vit D (1000 IU/day).
Figure 5
Figure 5
Forest plot of the effect of vitamin D intervention on the risk of low birthweight, based on the fixed-effects model. Yu 2009 (a): Vit D2 (800 IU/day); Yu 2009 (b): Vit D2 (single dose of 200000 IU).
Figure 6
Figure 6
Forest plot of the effect of vitamin D intervention on the risk of small for gestational age, based on the fixed-effects model. Yu 2009 (a): Vit D2 (800 IU/day); Yu 2009 (b): Vit D2 (single dose of 200000 IU).
Figure 7
Figure 7
Risk-of-bias assessment of randomized controlled trials included in the meta-analysis. Risk-of-bias summary (A) and graph (B), according to the Cochrane’s Collaboration tool for assessing risk of bias in randomized trials.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Funnel plot with estimated 95% confidence intervals for meta-analysis of the effect of vitamin D intervention on birthweight.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ramakrishnan U., Grant F., Goldenberg T., Zongrone A., Martorell R. Effect of women’s nutrition before and during early pregnancy on maternal and infant outcomes: A systematic review. Paediatr. Perinat. Epidemiol. 2012;26(Suppl. 1):285–301. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2012.01281.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Agodi A., Barchitta M., Valenti G., Marzagalli R., Frontini V., Marchese A.E. Increase in the prevalence of the MTHFR 677 TT polymorphism in women born since 1959: Potential implications for folate requirements. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2011;65:1302–1308. doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2011.125. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Holick M.F. Vitamin D: A d-lightful solution for health. J. Investig. Med. 2011;59:872–880. doi: 10.2310/JIM.0b013e318214ea2d. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Harvey N.C., Holroyd C., Ntani G., Javaid K., Cooper P., Moon R., Cole Z., Tinati T., Godfrey K., Dennison E., et al. Vitamin D supplementation in pregnancy: A systematic review. Health Technol. Assess. 2014;18:1–190. doi: 10.3310/hta18450. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pérez-López F.R., Pasupuleti V., Mezones-Holguin E., Benites-Zapata V.A., Thota P., Deshpande A., Hernandez A.V. Effect of vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy on maternal and neonatal outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Fertil. Steril. 2015;103:1278–1288. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.02.019. - DOI - PubMed