Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Feb 12:6:2374289519826281.
doi: 10.1177/2374289519826281. eCollection 2019 Jan-Dec.

Autopsy Standardized Mortality Review: A Pilot Study Offering a Methodology for Improved Patient Outcomes

C A Early  1 , M G F Gilliland  1 , K L Kelly  1 , W R Oliver  2 , P J Kragel  1
Affiliations

Autopsy Standardized Mortality Review: A Pilot Study Offering a Methodology for Improved Patient Outcomes

C A Early et al. Acad Pathol. .

Abstract

A standardized mortality review of hospital autopsies identified discrepancies between clinical diagnoses and autopsy findings, unexpected deaths, adequacy of diagnostic workup, presence of adverse event, and type of a quality issue if present. The standardized review elements were chosen based on a review of quality metrics commonly used by hospitals. The review was completed by the pathologist based on their initial autopsy findings. The final autopsy report was later reviewed to confirm the initial review findings. Major discrepancies in diagnosis were categorized as class I or II based on the modified Goldman criteria. Ninety-six hospital autopsy cases from January 2015 to February 2018 were included in the study. The overall major discrepancy rate was 27%. Class I discrepancies, where a diagnosis found at autopsy might have improved survival had it been made premortem, were identified in 16% of cases. Categories associated with increased discrepancy rates included unexpected deaths, inadequate workup, abnormal labs or imaging not addressed, and certain quality issues. Deaths not expected at admission but expected at the time of death, those with adverse events, those within 48 hours of a procedure, those within 48 hours of admission, those with physician-specific quality issues, and those with system or process issues were not significantly related to diagnostic accuracy.

Keywords: autopsy rate; diagnostic discrepancy; mortality review; quality assurance; unexpected mortality.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Mortality review form.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Marshall HS, Milikowski C. Comparison of clinical diagnoses and autopsy findings: six-year retrospective study. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2017;141:1262–1266. - PubMed
    1. Shojania KG, Burton EC, McDonald KM, Goldman L. Changes in rates of autopsy-detected diagnostic errors over time. JAMA. 2003;289:2849–2856. - PubMed
    1. Hoyert DL, Kung HC, Xu J. Autopsy patterns in 2003. National Center for Health Statistics. Vital Health Stat. 2007;1–27. - PubMed
    1. Scordi-Bello IA, Kalb TH, Lento PA. Clinical setting and extent of premortem evaluation do not predict autopsy discrepancy rates. Modern Pathol. 2010;23:1225–1230. - PubMed
    1. Burton EC. The autopsy: a professional responsibility in assuring quality of care. Am J Med Qual. 2002;17:56–60. - PubMed