Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Oct;10(5):460-474.
doi: 10.1007/s12975-019-00693-z. Epub 2019 Feb 22.

Management of De Novo Carotid Stenosis and Postintervention Restenosis-Carotid Endarterectomy Versus Carotid Artery Stenting-a Review of Literature

Affiliations
Review

Management of De Novo Carotid Stenosis and Postintervention Restenosis-Carotid Endarterectomy Versus Carotid Artery Stenting-a Review of Literature

Runqi Wangqin et al. Transl Stroke Res. 2019 Oct.

Abstract

The current literature indicates carotid endarterectomy (CEA) as the preferred treatment for symptomatic, moderate to severe carotid artery stenosis. However, recommendations for the management of acute tandem stenosis and complete occlusion, as well as postintervention restenosis of the carotid artery, remain controversial. Here, we review the literature evaluating these conditions and provide suggestions for clinical decision-making. Acute tandem stenosis or occlusion of the common and internal carotid arteries may be treated with angioplasty alone, reserving carotid artery stenting (CAS) or CEA for severe and complex cases. Patients who underwent CEA and developed ipsilateral restenosis may be subjected to angioplasty followed by CAS, which carries a lower risk of cranial nerve injury and subsequent restenosis of the artery. For post-CAS restenosis, current evidence recommends angioplasty and CAS for the management of moderate stenosis and CEA for severe stenosis of the carotid artery. Given the lack of level 1 evidence for the management of these conditions, the abovementioned recommendations may assist clinical decision-making; however, each case and its unique risks and benefits need to be assessed individually. Future studies evaluating and defining the risks and benefits of specific treatment strategies, such as CEA and CAS, in patients with acute tandem stenosis, occlusion, and postintervention restenosis of the carotid artery need to be conducted.

Keywords: Carotid artery stenosis; Carotid artery stenting; Endarterectomy; Restenosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. J Vasc Surg. 2011 Sep;54(3):699-705 - PubMed
    1. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2015 Sep;157(8):1313-8; discussion 1318-9 - PubMed
    1. Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2017 May;51(4):176-182 - PubMed
    1. J Vasc Surg. 2007 Nov;46(5):846-53; discussion 853-4 - PubMed
    1. J Endovasc Ther. 2003 Dec;10(6):1031-8 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources