Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2019 Mar;16 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):36-42.
doi: 10.1111/iwj.13028.

Use of prophylactic silicone adhesive dressings for maintaining skin integrity in intensive care unit patients: A randomised controlled trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Use of prophylactic silicone adhesive dressings for maintaining skin integrity in intensive care unit patients: A randomised controlled trial

Yun J Lee et al. Int Wound J. 2019 Mar.

Erratum in

  • Corrigendum.
    [No authors listed] [No authors listed] Int Wound J. 2019 Jun;16(3):872. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13121. Int Wound J. 2019. PMID: 31124314 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

Abstract

The aims of this randomised controlled study were to determine whether the application of silicone adhesive dressings with standard preventive care would reduce the impairment of skin integrity and to evaluate the subepidermal moisture (SEM) value in anatomical locations to predict impairment of skin integrity. Of the 71 intensive care unit patients enrolled, 35 and 31 were randomly assigned to the intervention and control groups, respectively. The SEM value was measured at each site (the coccyx, sacrum, and both buttocks) repeatedly three times at every dressing change. Collected data were analysed by multivariate linear regression, and least square means analysis was used to compare the SEM value at the sites of pressure injury (PI) and blanching erythema. There were fewer PIs (1 vs 9) and incidences of blanching erythema (5 vs 6) in the intervention group than in the control group (P = 0.006). The SEM value and difference of the SEM value from the initial value was higher in the group with PIs than in the group without PIs (P < 0.0001 and P = 0.001, respectively). There was a statistically significant difference in the incidence of impaired skin integrity between the groups. The SEM value may be an indicator for detecting impairment of skin integrity.

Keywords: intensive care unit; pressure injury; randomised controlled trial; silicone adhesive dressing.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Maria EL, Teresita P, Marnalyn H, Marie V. Pressure ulcers in the intensive care unit: new perspectives on an old problem. Crit Care Nurse. 2012;32:65‐70. - PubMed
    1. Lindgren M, Unosson M, Fredrikson M, Ek AC. Immobility‐a major risk factor for development of pressure ulcers among adult hospitalized patients: a prospective study. J Caring Sci. 2004;18:57‐64. - PubMed
    1. Manzano F, Navarro MJ, Roldan D, et al. Pressure ulcer incidence and risk factors in ventilated intensive care patients. J Crit Care. 2010;25:469‐476. - PubMed
    1. Brindle CT, Wegelin JA. Prophylactic dressing application to reduce pressure ulcer formation in cardiac surgery patients. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2012;39:133‐142. - PubMed
    1. Lowe JR. Skin integrity in critically ill obese patients. Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am. 2009;21:311‐322. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Grants and funding