Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2019 May;228(5):721-729.
doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2019.02.040. Epub 2019 Feb 19.

Cyst Fluid Biosignature to Predict Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms of the Pancreas with High Malignant Potential

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Cyst Fluid Biosignature to Predict Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms of the Pancreas with High Malignant Potential

Ajay V Maker et al. J Am Coll Surg. 2019 May.

Abstract

Background: Current standard-of-care technologies, such as imaging and cyst fluid analysis, are unable to consistently distinguish intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) of the pancreas at high risk of pancreatic cancer from low-risk IPMNs. The objective was to create a single-platform assay to identify IPMNs that are at high risk for malignant progression.

Study design: Building on the Verona International Consensus Conference branch duct IPMN biomarker review, additional protein, cytokine, mucin, DNA, and microRNA cyst fluid targets were identified for creation of a quantitative polymerase chain reaction-based assay. This included messenger RNA markers: ERBB2, GNAS, interleukin 1β, KRAS, MUCs1, 2, 4, 5AC, 7, prostaglandin E2R, PTGER2, prostaglandin E synthase 2, prostaglandin E synthase 1, TP63; microRNA targets: miRs 101, 106b, 10a, 142, 155, 17, 18a, 21, 217, 24, 30a, 342, 532, 92a, and 99b; and GNAS and KRAS mutational analysis. A multi-institutional international collaborative contributed IPMN cyst fluid samples to validate this platform. Cyst fluid gene expression levels were normalized, z-transformed, and used in classification and regression analysis by a support vector machine training algorithm.

Results: From cyst fluids of 59 IPMN patients, principal component analysis confirmed no institutional bias/clustering. Lasso (least absolute shrinkage and selection operator)-penalized logistic regression with binary classification and 5-fold cross-validation used area under the curve as the evaluation criterion to create the optimal signature to discriminate IPMNs as low risk (low/moderate dysplasia) or high risk (high-grade dysplasia/invasive cancer). The most predictive signature was achieved with interleukin 1β, MUC4, and prostaglandin E synthase 2 to accurately discriminate high-risk cysts from low-risk cysts with an area under the curve of up to 0.86 (p = 0.002).

Conclusions: We have identified a single-platform polymerase chain reaction-based assay of cyst fluid to accurately predict IPMNs with high malignant potential for additional studies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Workflow of cyst fluid preparation for input into the bioinformatics model to predict level of cyst dysplasia.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Removal of confounders. A Pearson correlation matrix was constructed between each pair of gene markers. GNAS, miR106B, miR155, miR24, miR92A, and miR532 were removed from the analysis due to high correlation of gene expression that confounded machine learning algorithms in identifying predictive markers for the biosignature.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) cyst fluid biosignature can differentiate high from low-risk cysts. Lasso penalized logistic regression with cross validation identified a 3-gene cyst fluid signature with optimal accuracy to predict the risk of pancreatic malignancy in IPMN. In this model, low-risk (low and moderate grade dysplasia) vs high-risk (high-grade dysplasia and invasive cancer) cysts were predicted with an accuracy, as measured by AUC, of 86%; y=0.36+ (−0.06IL1β) + (−0.17MUC4) + (−0.50PTGES2); AUC=0.86, p-value=0.002.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Laffan TA, Horton KM, Klein AP, et al. Prevalence of unsuspected pancreatic cysts on MDCT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008; 191(3):802–7. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Scheiman JM, Hwang JH, Moayyedi P. American gastroenterological association technical review on the diagnosis and management of asymptomatic neoplastic pancreatic cysts. Gastroenterology 2015; 148(4):824–48 e22. - PubMed
    1. Kimura W, Nagai H, Kuroda A, et al. Analysis of small cystic lesions of the pancreas. International Journal of Pancreatology 1995; 18(3):197–206. - PubMed
    1. Andrejevic-Blant S, Kosmahl M, Sipos B, et al. Pancreatic intraductal papillarymucinous neoplasms: a new and evolving entity. Virchows Arch 2007; 451(5):863–9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Khoury RE, Kabir C, Maker VK, et al. What is the Incidence of Malignancy in Resected Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms? An Analysis of Over 100 US Institutions in a Single Year. Ann Surg Oncol 2018; 25(6):1746–1751. - PubMed

Publication types

Substances