Trending Towards Safer Breast Cancer Surgeries? Examining Acute Complication Rates from A 13-Year NSQIP Analysis
- PMID: 30795637
- PMCID: PMC6407023
- DOI: 10.3390/cancers11020253
Trending Towards Safer Breast Cancer Surgeries? Examining Acute Complication Rates from A 13-Year NSQIP Analysis
Abstract
As breast cancer surgery continues to evolve, this study highlights the acute complication rates and predisposing risks following partial mastectomy (PM), mastectomy(M), mastectomy with muscular flap reconstruction (M + MF), mastectomy with implant reconstruction (M + I), and oncoplastic surgery (OPS). Data was collected from the American College of Surgeons NSQIP database (2005⁻2017). Complication rate and trend analyses were performed along with an assessment of odds ratios for predisposing risk factors using adjusted linear regression. 226,899 patients met the inclusion criteria. Complication rates have steadily increased in all mastectomy groups (p < 0.05). Cumulative complication rates between surgical categories were significantly different in each complication cluster (all p < 0.0001). Overall complication rates were: PM: 2.25%, OPS: 3.2%, M: 6.56%, M + MF: 13.04% and M + I: 5.68%. The most common predictive risk factors were mastectomy, increasing operative time, ASA class, BMI, smoking, recent weight loss, history of CHF, COPD and bleeding disorders (all p < 0.001). Patients who were non-diabetic, younger (age < 60) and treated as an outpatient all had protective OR for an acute complication (p < 0.0001). This study provides data comparing nationwide acute complication rates following different breast cancer surgeries. These can be used to inform patients during surgical decision making.
Keywords: breast conservation surgery; comorbidity; complication rate; mastectomy; mastectomy with reconstruction; oncoplastic surgery; trend analysis.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Surgical trends in breast cancer: a rise in novel operative treatment options over a 12 year analysis.Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019 Jan;173(2):267-274. doi: 10.1007/s10549-018-5018-1. Epub 2018 Oct 25. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019. PMID: 30361873 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Oncoplastic mammoplasty as a strategy for reducing reconstructive complications associated with postmastectomy radiation therapy.Breast J. 2014 May-Jun;20(3):302-7. doi: 10.1111/tbj.12257. Breast J. 2014. PMID: 24750512 Clinical Trial.
-
Impact of obesity on outcomes in breast reconstruction: analysis of 15,937 patients from the ACS-NSQIP datasets.J Am Coll Surg. 2013 Oct;217(4):656-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.03.031. Epub 2013 Jul 25. J Am Coll Surg. 2013. PMID: 23891077
-
Evolving surgical treatment decisions for male breast cancer: an analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database.Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018 Sep;171(2):427-434. doi: 10.1007/s10549-018-4830-y. Epub 2018 May 28. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018. PMID: 29808286
-
Breast reconstruction after mastectomy.Coll Antropol. 2010 Mar;34 Suppl 1:113-23. Coll Antropol. 2010. PMID: 20402306 Review.
Cited by
-
A Cost-Utility Analysis of the Use of -125 mm Hg Closed-incision Negative Pressure Therapy in Oncoplastic Breast Surgery.Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024 Oct 1;12(10):e6163. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000006163. eCollection 2024 Oct. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024. PMID: 39359700 Free PMC article.
-
Predictive risk factors of complications in different breast reconstruction methods.Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2020 Jul;182(2):345-354. doi: 10.1007/s10549-020-05705-3. Epub 2020 May 28. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2020. PMID: 32468337 Free PMC article.
-
Donor-Site Morbidity and Quality of Life after Autologous Breast Reconstruction with PAP versus TMG Flap.Curr Oncol. 2022 Aug 11;29(8):5682-5697. doi: 10.3390/curroncol29080448. Curr Oncol. 2022. PMID: 36005186 Free PMC article.
-
A Comparison of Patient-Reported Outcomes After Breast-Conserving Surgery and Mastectomy with Implant Breast Reconstruction.Ann Surg Oncol. 2019 Oct;26(10):3133-3140. doi: 10.1245/s10434-019-07548-9. Epub 2019 Jul 24. Ann Surg Oncol. 2019. PMID: 31342397 Free PMC article.
-
Does Age Matter? Estimating Risks of Locoregional Recurrence After Breast-conservative Surgery.In Vivo. 2020 May-Jun;34(3):1125-1132. doi: 10.21873/invivo.11884. In Vivo. 2020. PMID: 32354901 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Chand N.D., Browne V., Paramanathan N., Peiris L.J., Laws S.A., Rainsbury R.M. Patient-reported outcomes are better after oncoplastic breast conservation than after mastectomy and autologous reconstruction. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. Glob. Open. 2017;5:e1419. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000001419. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Bazzarelli A., Zhang J., Arnaout A. Patient-Reported Satisfaction Following Oncoplastic Breast-Conserving Therapy; Proceedings of the American Society of Breast Surgeons Annual Meeting; Dallas, TX, USA. 13 April 2016.
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous