Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Feb 22;10(1):917.
doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-08874-y.

Prototype of running clinical trials in an untrustworthy environment using blockchain

Affiliations

Prototype of running clinical trials in an untrustworthy environment using blockchain

Daniel R Wong et al. Nat Commun. .

Abstract

Monitoring and ensuring the integrity of data within the clinical trial process is currently not always feasible with the current research system. We propose a blockchain-based system to make data collected in the clinical trial process immutable, traceable, and potentially more trustworthy. We use raw data from a real completed clinical trial, simulate the trial onto a proof of concept web portal service, and test its resilience to data tampering. We also assess its prospects to provide a traceable and useful audit trail of trial data for regulators, and a flexible service for all members within the clinical trials network. We also improve the way adverse events are currently reported. In conclusion, we advocate that this service could offer an improvement in clinical trial data management, and could bolster trust in the clinical research process and the ease at which regulators can oversee trials.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The idealized clinical trial network in the context of a blockchain-based record system. The various transactions (along each arrow) and key participants (boxed) within a clinical trial are shown
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
The growing blockchain. With each new transaction that occurs, a block is appended and keeps track of information like the timestamp, sender, receiver, file contents, hash of the previous block, and current hash, all in an immutable data structure. On-chain storage of such elements requires minimal memory allocation linearly proportional to the amount of data being uploaded, since the additional book keeping elements are fixed-length strings. Hence scalability is possible, especially given adequate allocation of hardware made possible via growing cloud storage capabilities (see Supplementary Discussion). A summary, compressed blockchain is shown. The actual blockchain will have a beginning genesis block and individual blocks for each transaction (such as a new block for each CRF instead of a single block for all CRFs as shown). The compressed chain is shown to illustrate the chronology of the trial, and what information constitutes a block
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Portal functionality. a The public ledger shows the full transaction history since the start of the trial. Blocks are timestamped, indexed, and attached with the file of the transaction and identities of the participating parties. The regulator can easily download individual files, or all elements in bulk, and inspect when and between whom files are shared. b New versions of files are given a version number, which increments with each new version of that file. In the screenshot above, the original CRF was modified by the sponsor and automatically appended with a (v2) by the system (boxed in red). The responsible party and time of modification are readily apparent. c Internal validation and automated hash checks take place to verify the integrity of the data without the need to manually read through the data’s contents. Hash checks are performed chronologically starting with the genesis block, and verify that the hash of the contents of the block match what is to be expected (see Supplementary Methods). Validation fails when the treatmentDistribution.csv is modified at the storage level. The precise origin and location of the fault can be readily discerned. d Adverse events are auto populated from investigator uploaded CRFs to the pages of the regulator and DSMB, circumventing the normal, slower, and more error prone pathway that is normally taken for adverse event reporting. Such instances are available for inspection at the soonest possible time

References

    1. Gupta A. Fraud and misconduct in clinical research: a concern. Perspect. Clin. Res. 2013;4:144–147. doi: 10.4103/2229-3485.111800. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. George SL, Buyse M. Data fraud in clinical trials. Clin. Investig. 2015;5:161–173. doi: 10.4155/cli.14.116. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bhatt A. Quality of clinical trials: a moving target. Perspect. Clin. Res. 2011;2:124–128. doi: 10.4103/2229-3485.86880. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Valkenhoef G, Tervonen T, Brock B, Hillege H. Deficiencies in the transfer and viability of clinical trials evidence: a review of existing systems and standards. BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Mak. 2012;12:95. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-12-95. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hume S, Sarnikar S, Becnel L, Bennet D. Visualizing and validating metadata traceability within the CDISC standards. AMIA Jt Summits Transl. Sci. Proc. 2017;2017:158–165. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types