Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Feb 22;23(2):14.
doi: 10.1007/s11916-019-0748-2.

Functional Improvements Utilizing the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) in the Elderly after Epidural Steroid Injections

Affiliations
Review

Functional Improvements Utilizing the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) in the Elderly after Epidural Steroid Injections

Rene Przkora et al. Curr Pain Headache Rep. .

Abstract

Purpose of review: The treatment of debilitating pain and loss of function secondary to lumbar stenosis is in high demand with the aging patient population. Options, including epidural steroid injections (ESIs) and medication therapy, are limited and it is unclear if they provide any functional improvements. In this prospective study, we evaluate functional outcomes in older adults with symptomatic lumbar stenosis treated with ESIs compared to those managed with medications by introducing the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB). Our study was IRB-approved and included 16 patients, 68 to 83 years old, with symptomatic back and radicular leg pain secondary to lumbar stenosis. Patients could elect to undergo a lumbar ESI (n = 11) or be treated via medication management (n = 5). Numeric pain score, SPPB score, and adverse events were measured and compared at baseline and a 1-month follow-up visit.

Recent findings: Statistically significant improvements were observed from baseline compared to the 1-month follow-up for total SPPB score in the injection group. Similar improvements in the injection group were observed for pain scores and the SPPB subcomponents such as the 4-m walk test, chair stand time, and balance score. Comparatively, no statistically significant improvements were observed in the medication group. Lumbar ESIs improved objective physical capacity parameters and pain scores in elderly patients with symptomatic lumbar stenosis compared to medication management. In addition, the SPPB is an easy-to-use tool to measure changes in physical function in older adults and could easily be integrated into an outpatient pain clinic.

Keywords: Elderly; Epidural steroid injections; Lumbar stenosis and radicular pain; Short physical performance battery (SPPB).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: Each author certifies that he or she, or a member of his or her immediate family, has no commercial association (i.e., consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc.) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted manuscript.

Figures

Fig 1.
Fig 1.
Injection versus medical management group differences in mean change between pre- and post-intervention in (A) Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) total scores. (B) 4-meter walk test time (C), chair stand time (D), balance scores, and (E) pain scores for injection and medication management groups. Error bars represent standard error. An asterisk (*) indicates significant (P < 0.05, Wilcoxon signed rank tests) group differences between pre- and post-intervention within either injection or medication management group. Pound sign (#) indicates significant (P < 0.05, Mann-Whitney U test, Table 3) baseline differences injection or medication management group.
Fig 2.
Fig 2.
Percent change between pre- and post-intervention in (A) Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) total scores. (B) 4-meter walk test time (C), chair stand time (D), balance scores, and (E) pain scores for injection and medication management groups.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kalichman L, Cole R, Kim DH, Li L, Suri P, Guermazi A, Hunter DJ. Spinal stenosis prevalence and association with symptoms: The Framingham Study. Spine J. 2009;9:545–550. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kovacs FM, Urrútia G, Alarcón JD. Surgery versus conservative treatment for symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Spine. 2011; 36:E1335–1351. - PubMed
    1. Issack PS, Cunningham ME, Pumberger M, Hughes AP, Cammisa FP. Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: Evaluation and management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2012;20:527–535. - PubMed
    1. Borenstein D. Mechanical low back pain: a rheumatologist’s view. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2013;9:643–653. - PubMed
    1. Kreiner SD, Shaffer WO, Baisden JL, Gilbert TJ, Summers JT, Toton JF, Hwang SW, Mendel RC, Reitman CA; North American Spine Society. An evidence-based clinical guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (update). Spine J. 2013;13:734–743. - PubMed