Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Sep;29(9):4937-4947.
doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06067-1. Epub 2019 Feb 22.

Automatically computed rating scales from MRI for patients with cognitive disorders

Juha R Koikkalainen  1 , Hanneke F M Rhodius-Meester  2 , Kristian S Frederiksen  3 , Marie Bruun  3 , Steen G Hasselbalch  3 , Marta Baroni  4 , Patrizia Mecocci  4 , Ritva Vanninen  5   6 , Anne Remes  6 , Hilkka Soininen  6 , Mark van Gils  7 , Wiesje M van der Flier  2   8 , Philip Scheltens  2 , Frederik Barkhof  2   9   10 , Timo Erkinjuntti  11 , Jyrki M P Lötjönen  12 ; Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative
Affiliations

Automatically computed rating scales from MRI for patients with cognitive disorders

Juha R Koikkalainen et al. Eur Radiol. 2019 Sep.

Abstract

Objectives: The aims of this study were to examine whether visual MRI rating scales used in diagnostics of cognitive disorders can be estimated computationally and to compare the visual rating scales with their computed counterparts in differential diagnostics.

Methods: A set of volumetry and voxel-based morphometry imaging biomarkers was extracted from T1-weighted and FLAIR images. A regression model was developed for estimating visual rating scale values from a combination of imaging biomarkers. We studied three visual rating scales: medial temporal lobe atrophy (MTA), global cortical atrophy (GCA), and white matter hyperintensities (WMHs) measured by the Fazekas scale. Images and visual ratings from the Amsterdam Dementia Cohort (ADC) (N = 513) were used to develop the models and cross-validate them. The PredictND (N = 672) and ADNI (N = 752) cohorts were used for independent validation to test generalizability.

Results: The correlation coefficients between visual and computed rating scale values were 0.83/0.78 (MTA-left), 0.83/0.79 (MTA-right), 0.64/0.64 (GCA), and 0.76/0.75 (Fazekas) in ADC/PredictND cohorts. When performance in differential diagnostics was studied for the main types of dementia, the highest balanced accuracy, 0.75-0.86, was observed for separating different dementias from cognitively normal subjects using computed GCA. The lowest accuracy of about 0.5 for all the visual and computed scales was observed for the differentiation between Alzheimer's disease and frontotemporal lobar degeneration. Computed scales produced higher balanced accuracies than visual scales for MTA and GCA (statistically significant).

Conclusions: MTA, GCA, and WMHs can be reliably estimated automatically helping to provide consistent imaging biomarkers for diagnosing cognitive disorders, even among less experienced readers.

Key points: • Visual rating scales used in diagnostics of cognitive disorders can be estimated computationally from MRI images with intraclass correlations ranging from 0.64 (GCA) to 0.84 (MTA). • Computed scales provided high diagnostic accuracy with single-subject data (area under the receiver operating curve range, 0.84-0.94).

Keywords: Atrophy; Cognition disorders; Magnetic resonance imaging.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Neuroimage. 2000 Jun;11(6 Pt 1):805-21 - PubMed
    1. Lancet Neurol. 2003 Feb;2(2):89-98 - PubMed
    1. Stat Med. 1992 Jul;11(10):1305-19 - PubMed
    1. J Intern Med. 2004 Sep;256(3):183-94 - PubMed
    1. Neuroepidemiology. 2005;24(1-2):51-62 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources