Visual perception, cognition, and error in dermatologic diagnosis: Key cognitive principles
- PMID: 30797839
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2018.10.082
Visual perception, cognition, and error in dermatologic diagnosis: Key cognitive principles
Abstract
Dermatologic diagnosis relies on vision primarily and auditory and verbal input secondarily. Accurate dermatologic diagnosis is predicated on seeing and perceiving a skin finding, categorizing and naming the finding correctly, and comparing the visual data and data obtained from the totality of the clinical encounter (ie, from other sensory modalities) with one's working mental database of dermatologic diagnoses. The baseline assumption-which is false-is that a dermatologist is an expert at each of the aforementioned steps and transitions sequentially between them seamlessly in an error-free fashion. Each of these steps has inherent challenges, and the transitions between steps can also be problematic. In part 1 of this 2-part report, we describe the pitfalls associated with visual recognition. In part 2, we discuss cognitive heuristics as they relate to the dermatologic diagnostic process and prevention of diagnostic error.
Keywords: cognition; dermatologic diagnosis; error; gestalt; heuristic; inattentional blindness; metacognition; visual diagnosis; visual perception; visual recognition.
Copyright © 2019 American Academy of Dermatology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Visual perception, cognition, and error in dermatologic diagnosis: Diagnosis and error.J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019 Dec;81(6):1237-1245. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2018.12.072. Epub 2019 Feb 21. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019. PMID: 30797841 Review.
-
Cognitive and visual diagnostic errors in dermatology: part 1.Br J Dermatol. 2018 Dec;179(6):1263-1269. doi: 10.1111/bjd.16932. Epub 2018 Sep 25. Br J Dermatol. 2018. PMID: 29962022 Review.
-
Diagnostic heuristics in dermatology, part 2: metacognition and other fixes.Br J Dermatol. 2018 Dec;179(6):1270-1276. doi: 10.1111/bjd.17127. Epub 2018 Oct 14. Br J Dermatol. 2018. PMID: 30171684 Review.
-
Dermatology and its unique diagnostic heuristics.J Am Acad Dermatol. 2018 Jun;78(6):1239-1240. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2017.11.018. Epub 2017 Nov 10. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2018. PMID: 29133237 Review. No abstract available.
-
Cognitive bias and medical errors.J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019 Dec;81(6):1249. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2019.06.1284. Epub 2019 Jul 3. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019. PMID: 31279022 No abstract available.
Cited by
-
Hiding in Plain Sight: A Retrospective Review of Unrecognized Tumors During Dermatologic Surgery.Cureus. 2022 Mar 25;14(3):e23487. doi: 10.7759/cureus.23487. eCollection 2022 Mar. Cureus. 2022. PMID: 35475096 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of visual diagnostic accuracy of dermatologists practicing in Germany in patients with light skin and skin of color.Sci Rep. 2024 Apr 16;14(1):8740. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-59426-4. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 38627499 Free PMC article.
-
Biopsy-free in vivo virtual histology of skin using deep learning.Light Sci Appl. 2021 Nov 18;10(1):233. doi: 10.1038/s41377-021-00674-8. Light Sci Appl. 2021. PMID: 34795202 Free PMC article.
-
Interobserver Agreement on Dermoscopic Features and their Associations with In Situ and Invasive Cutaneous Melanomas.Acta Derm Venereol. 2021 Oct 14;101(10):adv00570. doi: 10.2340/actadv.v101.281. Acta Derm Venereol. 2021. PMID: 34596231 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical