Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2019 Feb 22;9(2):e024010.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024010.

Shortening patient-reported outcome measures through optimal test assembly: application to the Social Appearance Anxiety Scale in the Scleroderma Patient-centered Intervention Network Cohort

Daphna Harel  1   2 , Sarah D Mills  3 , Linda Kwakkenbos  4 , Marie-Eve Carrier  5 , Karen Nielsen  6 , Alexandra Portales  7 , Susan J Bartlett  8 , Vanessa L Malcarne  9   10 , Brett D Thombs  11 ; SPIN Investigators
Collaborators, Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Shortening patient-reported outcome measures through optimal test assembly: application to the Social Appearance Anxiety Scale in the Scleroderma Patient-centered Intervention Network Cohort

Daphna Harel et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objectives: The Social Appearance Anxiety Scale (SAAS) is a 16-item measure that assesses social anxiety in situations where appearance is evaluated. The objective was to use optimal test assembly (OTA) methods to develop and validate a short-form SAAS based on objective and reproducible criteria.

Design: This study was a cross-sectional analysis of baseline data from adults enrolled in the Scleroderma Patient-centered Intervention Network (SPIN) Cohort.

Setting: Adults in the SPIN Cohort in the present study were enrolled at 28 centres in Canada, the USA and the UK.

Participants: The SAAS was administered to 926 adults with scleroderma.

Primary and secondary measures: The SAAS, Brief Fear of Negative Evaluation II (BFNE II), Brief Satisfaction with Appearance Scale (Brief-SWAP), Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (PHQ8) and Social Interaction Anxiety Scale-6 (SIAS-6) were collected, as well as demographic characteristics.

Results: OTA methods identified a maximally informative shortened version for each possible form length between 1 and 15 items. The final shortened version was selected based on prespecified criteria for reliability, concurrent validity and statistically equivalent convergent validity with the BFNE II scale. A five-item short version was selected (SAAS-5). The SAAS-5 had a Cronbach's α of 0.95 and had high concurrent validity with the full-length form (r=0.97). The correlation of the SAAS-5 with the BFNE II was 0.66, which was statistically equivalent to that of the full-length form. Furthermore, the correlation of the SAAS-5 with the two subscales of the Brief-SWAP, and the SIAS-6, were statistically equivalent to that of the full-length form.

Conclusions: OTA was an efficient method for shortening the full-length SAAS to create the SAAS-5.

Keywords: generalized partial credit model; optimal test assembly; patient reported outcome measure; short form; systemic sclerosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Item and test information curves of the SAAS. The left hand plot shows the 16 individual item information curves. The right hand plot compares the test information functions of the full SAAS (solid line) and SAAS-5 (dashed line). SAAS, Social Appearance Anxiety Scale.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Cella D, Yount S, Rothrock N, et al. . The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS): progress of an NIH Roadmap cooperative group during its first two years. Med Care 2007;45(5 Suppl 1):S3–11. 10.1097/01.mlr.0000258615.42478.55 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Coste J, Guillemin F, Pouchot J, et al. . Methodological approaches to shortening composite measurement scales. J Clin Epidemiol 1997;50:247–52. 10.1016/S0895-4356(96)00363-0 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Goetz C, Coste J, Lemetayer F, et al. . Item reduction based on rigorous methodological guidelines is necessary to maintain validity when shortening composite measurement scales. J Clin Epidemiol 2013;66:710–8. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.12.015 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kruyen PM, Emons WHM, Sijtsma K. On the shortcomings of shortened tests: a literature review. International Journal of Testing 2013;13:223–48. 10.1080/15305058.2012.703734 - DOI
    1. Stanton JM, Sinar EF, Balzer WK, et al. . Issues and strategies for reducing the length of self-report scales. Pers Psychol 2002;55:167–94. 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2002.tb00108.x - DOI

Publication types