Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jan 16:2019:8148510.
doi: 10.1155/2019/8148510. eCollection 2019.

Curcumin Suppresses Hepatic Stellate Cell-Induced Hepatocarcinoma Angiogenesis and Invasion through Downregulating CTGF

Affiliations

Curcumin Suppresses Hepatic Stellate Cell-Induced Hepatocarcinoma Angiogenesis and Invasion through Downregulating CTGF

Shan Shao et al. Oxid Med Cell Longev. .

Abstract

Microenvironment plays a vital role in tumor progression; we focused on elucidating the role of hepatic stellate cells (HSCs) in hepatocarcinoma (HCC) aggressiveness and investigated the potential protective effect of curcumin on HSC-driven hepatocarcinoma angiogenesis and invasion. Our data suggest that HSCs increase HCC reactive oxygen species (ROS) production to upregulate hypoxia-inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α) expression to promote angiogenesis, epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT) process and invasion. And HSCs could secrete soluble factors, such as interleukin-6 (IL-6), vascular endothelial cell growth factor (VEGF), and stromal-derived factor-1 (SDF-1) to facilitate HCC progression. Curcumin could significantly suppress the above HSC-induced effects in HCC and could abrogate ROS and HIF-1α expression in HCC. HIF-1α or connective tissue growth factor (CTGF) knockdown could abolish the aforementioned curcumin affection. Moreover, CTGF is a downstream gene of HIF-1α. In addition, nuclear factor E2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) and glutathione (GSH) are involved in curcumin protection of HCC. These data indicate that curcumin may induce ROS scavenging by upregulating Nrf2 and GSH, thus inhibiting HIF-1α stabilization to suppress CTGF expression to exhibit its protection on HCC. Curcumin has a promising therapeutic effect on HCC. CTGF is responsible for curcumin-induced protection in HCC.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Curcumin inhibits HSC-induced HCC angiogenesis by suppressing HIF-1α. HUVECs were incubated with conditioned medium from the HepG2 (St Med), HepG2 + HSC (CM), HepG2 + HSC + curcumin (CM + Cur), HepG2 + HSC + NAC (CM + NAC), sh-HIF-1α-HepG2 + HSC + curcumin (sh-HIF-1α-CM + Cur), sh-HIF-1α-HepG2 + HSC + NAC (sh-HIF-1α-CM + NAC) groups, HSC only (HSC-CM), and sh-HIF-1α-HepG2 only (sh-HIF-1α-CM). Cur stands for Curcumin. 50 μM Curcumin was added into the medium for 24 h in CM + Cur group or sh-HIF-1α-CM + Cur group. 20 mM NAC was added into the medium for 24 h in CM + NAC group or sh-HIF-1α-CM + NAC group. (a) Angiogenesis was evaluated based on tube formation (indicated by arrows). (b) Tube numbers were counted. p < 0.05 versus St Med group (n = 6), #p < 0.05 versus CM group (n = 6). (c) HIF-1α in HepG2 cells or HSCs was silenced by sh-RNA. HIF-1α and β-actin expression levels were determined by immunoblotting. p < 0.05, sh-control versus sh-HIF-1α, n = 3. (d) HepG2 or HSCs were treated as in (c), and HIF-1α and β-actin expression levels were determined by qRT-PCR. p < 0.05, sh-control versus sh-HIF-1α, n = 3. All data are representative of at least three independent experiments. (e) Hydrogen peroxide production in HepG2 cells was determined using DCF-DA, and total protein content was used to normalize the data. p < 0.05 versus St Med group (n = 6), #p < 0.05 versus CM (n = 6).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Curcumin decreased VEGF, IL-6, and SDF-1 expression in HCC via inhibiting HIF-1α. St Med stands for standard media of PSC cells, CM stands for conditioned media from HepG2 cells, CM + Cur stands for conditioned media from HepG2 cells pretreated with curcumin, CM + NAC stands for conditioned media from HepG2 cells pretreated with NAC, sh-HIF-1α-CM + Cur stands for HSC cell knockdown with sh-HIF-1α and cultured with conditioned media from HepG2 cells pretreated with curcumin, sh-HIF-1α-CM + NAC stands for HSC knockdown with sh-HIF-1α and cultured with conditioned media from HepG2 cells pretreated with NAC, and sh-HIF-1α-CM stands for HSC cell knockdown with sh-HIF-1α and cultured with conditioned media from HepG2 cells. ELISA was assayed to assess IL-6 (a), VEGF (b), and SDF-1 (c) expression in the conditioned medium of the indicated groups. IL-6 (d), VEGF (e), and SDF-1 (f) mRNA expression in HSCs was detected by qRT-PCR, as described in the Materials and Methods. p < 0.05 versus St Med group (n = 6), #p < 0.05 versus CM (n = 6). All data are representative of at least three independent experiments.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Curcumin abrogated HSC-induced increases in HIF-1α, MMP-9 expression and EMT process in HepG2 cells though down-regulating HIF-1α. St Med stands for standard media of HepG2 cells, CM stands for conditioned media from HSCs, CM + Cur stands for conditioned media from HSCs with curcumin exposure, CM + NAC stands for conditioned media from HSCs with NAC exposure, sh-HIF-1α-CM + Cur stands for sh-HIF-1α knockdown HepG2 cells treated with conditioned media from HSCs pretreated with curcumin, sh-HIF-1α-CM + NAC stands for sh-HIF-1α knockdown HepG2 cells treated with conditioned media from HSCs pretreated with NAC, and sh-HIF-1α-CM stands for sh-HIF-1α knockdown HepG2 cells treated with conditioned media from HSCs. (A&B&C) HIF-1α, MMP-9, E-cadherin, vimentin, and β-actin protein expression levels were evaluated by immunoblotting. p < 0.05 versus St Med group (n = 3), #p < 0.05 versus CM group (n = 3). (d, e) HIF-1α, MMP-9, E-cadherin, vimentin, and β-actin mRNA expression levels were determined by qRT-PCR. p < 0.05 versus St Med group (n = 3); #p < 0.05 versus CM (n = 3). All data are representative of at least three independent experiments.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Curcumin suppressed HSC-induced invasion in HepG2 cells through decreasing HIF-1α. St Med stands for standard media of HepG2 cells, CM stands for conditioned media from HSCs, CM + Cur stands for conditioned media from HSCs with curcumin exposure, CM + NAC stands for conditioned media from HSCs with NAC exposure, sh-HIF-1α-CM + Cur stands for sh-HIF-1α knockdown HepG2 cells treated with conditioned media from HSCs pretreated with curcumin, sh-HIF-1α-CM + NAC stands for sh-HIF-1α knockdown HepG2 cells treated with conditioned media from HSCs pretreated with NAC, and sh-HIF-1α-CM stands for sh-HIF-1α knockdown HepG2 cells treated with conditioned media from HSCs. The cells were placed in a Matrigel-coated invasion chamber for 20 h. (a, b) We evaluated invasion ability by counting the numbers of migrated cells in ten randomly selected fields under a light microscope at ×100 magnification. p < 0.05 versus St Med group (n = 6), #p < 0.05 versus CM (n = 6). All data are representative of at least three independent experiments.
Figure 5
Figure 5
CTGF interference abrogates the observed effects of HIF-1α silencing and curcumin on HSC activation and HCC invasion. (a) HepG2 cells were silenced by control shRNA (sh-control) or shRNA targeting HIF-1α (sh-HIF-1α); CTGF protein levels of HepG2 cells were analyzed by western blot. CTGF interference efficiency in HSCs and HepG2 cells were analyzed by western blot (b) and qRT-PCR (c). (d, e) HSCs transfected with shRNA were cultured with or without curcumin for 12 h and serum starved for an additional 24 h. (d) HIF-1α and VEGF protein level of HSCs were analyzed by western blot. (e) HIF-1α and VEGF mRNA level of HSCs were analyzed by qRT-PCR. HepG2 cells transfected with CTGF shRNA were incubated with the conditioned media (CM) from HSCs with or without curcumin for 24 h. The cells were lysed, and E-cadherin and vimentin expression levels were analyzed by western blot (f) and qRT-PCR (g). p < 0.05. All data are representative of at least three independent experiments.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Nrf2 and GSH participate in curcumin-induced HCC protection. (a) HepG2 cells were silenced by control shRNA (sh-control), shRNA targeting HIF-1α (sh-HIF-1α), or shRNA targeting CTGF (sh-CTGF); nuclear Nrf2 protein levels of HepG2 cells were analyzed by western blot. (b) Glutathione (GSH) and glutathione disulfide (GSSG) levels were evaluated in HepG2 cells. p < 0.05 versus St Med group (n = 3), #p < 0.05 versus CM (n = 3). All data are representative of at least three independent experiments.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Forner A. Hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance with miRNAs. The Lancet Oncology. 2015;16(7):743–745. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00014-5. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Abou-Alfa G. K., Venook A. P. The antiangiogenic ceiling in hepatocellular carcinoma: does it exist and has it been reached? The Lancet Oncology. 2013;14(7):e283–e288. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70161-X. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bowyer C., Lewis A. L., Lloyd A. W., Phillips G. J., Macfarlane W. M. Hypoxia as a target for drug combination therapy of liver cancer. Anti-Cancer Drugs. 2017;28(7):771–780. doi: 10.1097/CAD.0000000000000516. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Forner A., Llovet J. M., Bruix J. Hepatocellular carcinoma. Lancet. 2012;379(9822):1245–1255. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61347-0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Forner A., Reig M., Bruix J. Hepatocellular carcinoma. Lancet. 2018;391(10127):1301–1314. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30010-2. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms