Accuracy of Computed Tomography in Differentiating Perforated from Nonperforated Appendicitis, Taking Histopathology as the Gold Standard
- PMID: 30800545
- PMCID: PMC6384046
- DOI: 10.7759/cureus.3735
Accuracy of Computed Tomography in Differentiating Perforated from Nonperforated Appendicitis, Taking Histopathology as the Gold Standard
Abstract
Introduction Acute appendicitis is one of the more common causes of acute abdominal pain. It occurs when the lumen of the appendix is obstructed, leading to inflammation and finally perforation. The preoperative differentiation of perforated from nonperforated appendicitis is important and helpful to define prognosis and determine an adequate therapeutic approach, including consideration for nonsurgical treatment. This study recommends computed tomography (CT), a noninvasive method of investigation, be used frequently in clinically suspected cases of perforated appendicitis in the Pakistani population for better patient outcomes. Objective To determine the diagnostic accuracy of CT in differentiating perforated from nonperforated appendicitis by using histopathology as the gold standard. Material and methods A total of 236 patients with a clinical suspicion of appendicitis were included in this study. CT was performed in Liaquat National Hospital and Medical College. At the time of scanning, intravenous contrast was administered. Histopathology was used as the diagnostic gold standard. CT findings were documented using a proforma. The patient was returned to the referring department and followed after surgery for histopathology. Results Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values, as well as the accuracy of CT in the detection of perforated appendicitis, was 71.4%, 90.7%, 62.5%, 93.6%, and 87.3%, respectively. Conclusion CT findings can be used to select patients with perforated appendicitis for initial nonoperative management.
Keywords: acute appendicitis; computed tomography; non-perforated appendicitis.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Differentiation of early perforated from nonperforated appendicitis: MDCT findings, MDCT diagnostic performance, and clinical outcome.Abdom Imaging. 2014 Jun;39(3):459-66. doi: 10.1007/s00261-014-0117-x. Abdom Imaging. 2014. PMID: 24633221
-
Perforated appendicitis: accuracy of ct diagnosis and correlation of ct findings with the length of hospital stay.J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2007 Dec;17(12):721-5. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2007. PMID: 18182135
-
Perforated versus nonperforated acute appendicitis: accuracy of multidetector CT detection.Radiology. 2006 Dec;241(3):780-6. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2413051896. Radiology. 2006. PMID: 17114626
-
Diagnostic Performance of US for Differentiating Perforated from Nonperforated Pediatric Appendicitis: A Prospective Cohort Study.Radiology. 2017 Mar;282(3):835-841. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2016160175. Epub 2016 Oct 31. Radiology. 2017. PMID: 27797677
-
Classification of acute appendicitis (CAA): treatment directed new classification based on imaging (ultrasound, computed tomography) and pathology.Int J Colorectal Dis. 2021 Nov;36(11):2347-2360. doi: 10.1007/s00384-021-03940-8. Epub 2021 Jun 18. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2021. PMID: 34143276 Review.
Cited by
-
Predictors and management outcomes of perforated appendicitis in sub-Saharan African countries: A retrospective cohort study.Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2022 Jul 14;80:104194. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2022.104194. eCollection 2022 Aug. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2022. PMID: 36045808 Free PMC article.
-
Discriminating complicated from uncomplicated appendicitis by ultrasound imaging, computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging: systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy.BJS Open. 2021 Mar 5;5(2):zraa030. doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zraa030. BJS Open. 2021. PMID: 33688952 Free PMC article.
-
Diagnostic Accuracy of Alvarado Versus Raja Isteri Pengiran Anak Saleha Appendicitis (RIPASA) Scores With Histopathology As Gold Standard for Acute Appendicitis: A Cross-Sectional Study.Cureus. 2025 Jun 16;17(6):e86151. doi: 10.7759/cureus.86151. eCollection 2025 Jun. Cureus. 2025. PMID: 40671991 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical scores (Alvarado and AIR scores) versus imaging (ultrasound and CT scan) in the diagnosis of equivocal cases of acute appendicitis: a randomized controlled study.Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2023 Mar 14;85(4):676-683. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000000270. eCollection 2023 Apr. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2023. PMID: 37113930 Free PMC article.
-
CT based Acute Appendicitis Severity Index for acute appendicitis and validate its effectiveness in predicting complicated appendicitis.Emerg Radiol. 2021 Oct;28(5):921-927. doi: 10.1007/s10140-021-01950-1. Epub 2021 May 25. Emerg Radiol. 2021. PMID: 34032950
References
-
- Examining a common disease with unknown etiology: trends in epidemiology and surgical management of appendicitis in California, 1995-2009. Anderson JE, Bickler SW, Chang DC, Talamini MA. World J Surg. 2012;36:2787–2794. - PubMed
-
- Perforated appendix contributing factors. Ahmed T, Ali Z, Ali A, Anjum S. https://jumdc.tuf.edu.pk/articles/volume-1/no-2/UMDC4_Perforated-appendi... JUMDC. 2010;1:11–16.
-
- Acute perforated appendicitis: an analysis of risk factors to guide surgical decision making. Williams R, Barreto S, Thomas T, Tiong L, Travers E, Mackillop C, Lorimer M. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22466494. Indian J Med Sci. 2010;64:58–65. - PubMed
-
- Perforated appendicitis accuracy of CT diagnosis and correlation of CT findings with length of hospital stay. Siddiqui AH, Afzal S. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18182135. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2007;17:721–725. - PubMed
-
- CT in appendicitis. Chalazonitis AN, Tzovara I, Sammouti E, et al. http://dirjournal.org/sayilar/18/buyuk/pdf_DIR_154.pdf Diagn Interv Radiol. 2008;13:19–25. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources