Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1986 Jan 4;292(6512):48-9.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.292.6512.48.

Where respect for autonomy is not the answer

Where respect for autonomy is not the answer

R Gillon. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). .

Abstract

KIE: In a series of preceding articles on medical ethics, Gillon emphasized the centrality of the principle of respect for autonomy. Here he outlines several types of circumstances in which medical paternalism is morally justified based on the Hippocratic principles of medical beneficence and non-maleficence. The most obvious examples are circumstances of considerably impaired "autonomy of thought," as in the case of young children or severely mentally handicapped persons. Impairment of "autonomy of action," as in physical handicap, does not justify overriding respect for autonomy. Paternalism may be justified by gross impairment of "volitional autonomy," caused either by intrinsic factors such as severe depression or by extrinsic factors such as duress. There is need for a dialogue between the medical profession and society to decide on criteria for determining competence and for establishing who is to make proxy decisions for incompetent patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Am J Psychiatry. 1977 Mar;134(3):279-84 - PubMed
    1. Int J Law Psychiatry. 1982;5(1):29-50 - PubMed
    1. J Med Ethics. 1982 Dec;8(4):173-9 - PubMed
    1. J Med Ethics. 1982 Dec;8(4):195-8 - PubMed
    1. J Med Ethics. 1983 Sep;9(3):146-51 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources