Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1986 Jan 11;292(6513):126-7.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.292.6513.126.

Acts and omissions, killing and letting die

R Gillon

Acts and omissions, killing and letting die

R Gillon. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). .

Abstract

KIE: Gillon asks what, if any, moral importance resides in the distinction between killing and letting die in the context of medical care. He considers and rejects the acts and omissions doctrine, which claims that actions (killing) resulting in some undesirable end are in general morally worse than failures to act (allowing to die) that have the same result. He also refutes the argument that the moral distinction between killing and letting die is one of harming versus benefitting, and that a physician has a responsibility not to harm (kill) a patient but no duty to help (keep alive). Gillon concludes by discussing the moral claims upon which the Roman Catholic rejection of the acts and omissions doctrine is based, which are the subjects of his next British Medical Journal article on medical ethics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. J Med Ethics. 1979 Jun;5(2):65-7 - PubMed
    1. Hastings Cent Rep. 1985 Jun;15(3):5-9 - PubMed
    1. Perspect Biol Med. 1973 Summer;16(4):529-57 - PubMed
    1. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1982 Nov 13;285(6352):1373-5 - PubMed
    1. Arch Intern Med. 1983 Aug;143(8):1561-3 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources