An Introductory, Computer-Based Learning Module for Interpreting Noncontrast Head Computed Tomography
- PMID: 30800921
- PMCID: PMC6342421
- DOI: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10721
An Introductory, Computer-Based Learning Module for Interpreting Noncontrast Head Computed Tomography
Abstract
Introduction: New radiology and other residents must quickly assimilate a vast amount of anatomic and pathologic information when learning to interpret noncontrast head computed tomography (CT). No interactive, computer-based module using a search-pattern approach to provide new residents with the groundwork for interpretation of noncontrast head CT previously existed.
Methods: We developed such a learning module using PowerPoint. First-year radiology residents completed the module prior to their neuroradiology rotation, and neurology residents completed it during orientation. Residents took 20-question pre- and posttests to assess knowledge and a postmodule survey. Each resident was randomized to one of two pretests and took the opposite as the posttest. Scores were collected over 5 years for radiology residents and 4 years for neurology residents. Statistical analysis of scores was performed using t tests.
Results: Forty-seven first-year radiology residents and 31 neurology residents completed the module and the pre- and posttests. Scores for all residents either stayed the same or increased, regardless of the order of the versions of the pre- or posttests; the mean score increase was 4 (p < .0001) out of 20. Radiology residents had higher mean scores than neurology residents on the pre- and posttests, which were statistically significant (p < .04 and .0004, respectively). Feedback on the survey was overwhelmingly positive.
Discussion: This computerized learning module is effective for teaching basic interpretation skills to new radiology and neurology residents. The module allows for asynchronous, programmed learning and the use of a step-by-step search-pattern approach.
Keywords: Learning Module; Noncontrast Head Computed Tomography; Search Pattern.
Conflict of interest statement
None to report.
References
-
- Prezzia C, Vorona G, Greenspan R. Fourth-year medical student opinions and basic knowledge regarding the field of radiology. Acad Radiol. 2013;20(3):272–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2012.10.004 - PubMed
-
- Nasca TJ, Philibert I, Brigham T, Flynn TC. The Next GME Accreditation System—rationale and benefits. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(11):1051–1056. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsr1200117 - PubMed
-
- Bruni SG, Bartlett E, Yu E. Factors involved in discrepant preliminary radiology resident interpretations of neuroradiological imaging studies: a retrospective analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012;198(6):1367–1374. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.11.7525 - PubMed
-
- Walls J, Hunter N, Brasher PMA, Ho SGF. The DePICTORS Study: discrepancies in preliminary interpretation of CT scans between on-call residents and staff. Emerg Radiol. 2009;16(4):303–308. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-009-0795-9 - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Molecular Biology Databases