Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Mar 1;10(2):196-204.
doi: 10.1093/advances/nmy101.

Perspective: What Does Stunting Really Mean? A Critical Review of the Evidence

Affiliations
Review

Perspective: What Does Stunting Really Mean? A Critical Review of the Evidence

Jef L Leroy et al. Adv Nutr. .

Abstract

The past decade has seen an unprecedented increase in attention to undernutrition, and drastically reducing child stunting has become a global development objective. The strong focus on linear growth retardation and stunting has enabled successful advocacy for nutrition, but with this focus has come some confusion and misunderstanding about the meaning of linear growth retardation and stunting among researchers, donors, and agencies active in nutrition. Motivated by the belief that a sharp focus will further accelerate progress in reducing undernutrition, we critically reviewed the evidence. The global attention to stunting is based on the premise that any intervention aimed at improving linear growth will subsequently lead to improvements in the correlates of linear growth retardation and stunting. Current evidence and understanding of mechanisms does not support this causal thinking, with 2 exceptions: linear growth retardation is a cause of difficult births and poor birth outcomes. Linear growth retardation is associated with (but does not cause) delayed child development, reduced earnings in adulthood, and chronic diseases. We thus propose distinguishing 2 distinctly different meanings of linear growth retardation and stunting. First, the association between linear growth retardation (or stunting) and other outcomes makes it a useful marker. Second, the causal links with difficult births and poor birth outcomes make linear growth retardation and stunting outcomes of intrinsic value. In many cases a focus on linear growth retardation and stunting is not necessary to improve the well-being of children; in many other cases, it is not sufficient to reach that goal; and for some outcomes, promoting linear growth is not the most cost-efficient strategy. We appeal to donors, program planners, and researchers to be specific in selecting nutrition outcomes and to target those outcomes directly.

Keywords: birth outcomes; causality; child development; chronic disease; earnings; global development objective; linear growth retardation; marker; stunting; undernutrition.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Commonly accepted framework showing the importance of linear growth retardation (A); and proposed framework distinguishing between child linear growth as an indicator reflective of the past, as indicator predicting the future, and as an outcome in its own right (B).

Comment in

References

    1. Black RE, Victora CG, Walker SP, Bhutta ZA, Christian P, de Onis M, Ezzati M, Grantham-McGregor S, Katz J, Martorell R et al.. Maternal and child undernutrition and overweight in low-income and middle-income countries. Lancet. 2013;382:427–51. - PubMed
    1. Gillespie S, van den Bold M. Stories of change in nutrition: an overview. Glob Food Sec. 2017;13:1–11. - PMC - PubMed
    1. WHO. Global Nutrition Targets 2025: Stunting Policy Brief (WHO/NMH/NHD/14.3). Geneva: WHO; 2014.
    1. WHO Expert Committee on Physical Status. Physical Status: The Use and Interpretation of Anthropometry. Geneva: WHO; 1995. - PubMed
    1. WHO Multicentre Growth Reference Study Group. WHO child growth standards based on length/height, weight and age. Acta Paediatr. 2006;Suppl 405:76–85. - PubMed

Publication types