Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Apr;46(4):1938-1946.
doi: 10.1002/mp.13450. Epub 2019 Mar 7.

Detection of potential microcalcification clusters using multivendor for-presentation digital mammograms for short-term breast cancer risk estimation

Affiliations
Review

Detection of potential microcalcification clusters using multivendor for-presentation digital mammograms for short-term breast cancer risk estimation

Maya Alsheh Ali et al. Med Phys. 2019 Apr.

Abstract

Purpose: We explore using the number of potential microcalcification clusters detected in for-presentation mammographic images (the images which are typically accessible to large epidemiological studies) a marker of short-term breast cancer risk.

Methods: We designed a three-step algorithm for detecting potential microcalcification clusters in for-presentation digital mammograms. We studied association with short-term breast cancer risk using a nested case control design, with a mammography screening cohort as a source population. In total, 373 incident breast cancer cases (diagnosed at least 3 months after a negative screen at study entry) and 1466 matched controls were included in our study. Conditional logistic regression Wald tests were used to test for association with the presence of microcalcifications at study entry. We compared results of these analyses to those obtained using a Computer-aided Diagnosis (CAD) software (VuComp) on corresponding for-processing images (images which are used clinically, but typically not saved).

Results: We found a moderate agreement between our measure of potential microcalcification clusters on for-presentation images and a CAD measure on for-processing images. Similar evidence of association with short-term breast cancer risk was found (P = 1 × 10 - 10 and P = 9 × 10 - 09 , for our approach on for-presentation images and for the CAD measure on for-processing images, respectively) and interestingly both measures contributed independently to association with a short-term risk (P = 9 × 10 - 03 for the CAD measure, adjusted for our proposed method and P = 1 × 10 - 04 for our proposed method, adjusted for the CAD measure).

Conclusion: Meaningful measurement of potential microcalcifications, in the context of short-term breast cancer risk assessment, is feasible for for-presentation images across a range of vendors. Our algorithm for for-presentation images performs similarly to a CAD algorithm on for-processing images, hence our algorithm can be a useful tool for research on microcalcifications and their role on breast cancer risk, based on large-scale epidemiological studies with access to for-presentation images.

Keywords: Multivendor full-field digital mammography; breast cancer risk; for-presentation format.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Microcalcification clusters with different background: (a) fatty, (b) and (c) mixed with high density structure, and (d) glandular.
Figure 2
Figure 2
A schematic overview of the proposed method. The preprocessing step includes the intensity transformation and the DOG filtering. The detection of candidates includes the HOG filtering and the segmentation. The final step includes removing noise and clustering of potential microcalcifications. The output of each step is shown on three different patches: a group of microcalcifications in the first two rows, and a false detection caused by linear structures in the third row. The microcalcifications in magenta are the retained ones and the ones in green are discarded in the cleaning step. Finally only the grouped microcalcifications are kept and the single microcalcifications are eliminated. [Color figure can be viewed at http://wileyonlinelibrary.com]

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Michailidou K, Beesley J, Lindstrom S, et al. Genome‐wide association analysis of more than 120,000 individuals identifies 15 new susceptibility loci for breast cancer. Nat Genet. 2015;47:373. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Boyd NF, Guo H, Martin LJ, et al. Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer. New Eng J Med. 2007;356:227–236. - PubMed
    1. Hall P, Easton D. Breast cancer screening: time to target women at risk. Br J Cancer. 2013;108:2202–2204. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tan M, Zheng B, Leader JK, Gur D. Association between changes in mammographic image features and risk for near‐term breast cancer development. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2016;35:1719–1728. - PMC - PubMed
    1. McCann J. Stockton D. Godward S. Impact of false‐positive mammography on subsequent screening attendance and risk of cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 2002;4:R11. - PMC - PubMed