Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Jan 8;22(1):E001-E007.
doi: 10.1532/hsf.2024.

Can Lung Transplant Surgeons Still Be Scientists? High Productivity Despite Competitive Funding

Affiliations
Review

Can Lung Transplant Surgeons Still Be Scientists? High Productivity Despite Competitive Funding

Adishesh Kalya Narahari et al. Heart Surg Forum. .

Abstract

Background: Today's declining federal budget for scientific research is making it consistently more difficult to become federally funded. We hypothesized that even in this difficult era, surgeon-scientists have remained among the most productive and impactful researchers in lung transplantation.

Methods: Grants awarded by the NIH for the study of lung transplantation between 1985 and 2015 were identified by searching NIH RePORTER for 5 lung transplantation research areas. A grant impact metric was calculated for each grant by dividing the sum of impact factors for all associated manuscripts by the total funding for that grant. We used nonparametric univariate analysis to compare grant impact metrics by department.

Results: We identified 109 lung transplantation grants, totaling approximately $300 million, resulting in 2304 papers published in 421 different journals. Surgery has the third highest median grant impact metric (4.2 per $100,000). The department of surgery had a higher median grant impact metric compared to private companies (P <.0001). There was no statistical difference in the grant impact metric compared to all other medical specialties, individual departments with multiple grants, or all basic science departments (all P >.05).

Conclusions: Surgeon-scientists in the field of lung transplantation have received fewer grants and less total funding compared to other researchers but have maintained an equally high level of productivity and impact. The dual-threat academic surgeon-scientist is an important asset to the research community and should continue to be supported by the NIH.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Median grant impact metric of departments studying lung transplantation
The median grant impact metric for departments with 3 or more grants is shown. Surgery departments were significant when compared to private companies using univariate analysis
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. 2005 – 2015 Median grant impact metric of departments studying lung transplantation
The median grant impact for departments with 3 or more grants and grants active between 2005-2015 is shown. All departments were significantly greater than private companies using Mann-Whitney U-test. **** p < 0.0001, ** p < 0.01, * p < 0.05

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hartert M, Senbaklavaci Ö, Gohrbandt B, Fischer BM, Buhl R, Vahl C-F. Lung Transplantation: a Treatment Option in End-Stage Lung Disease. Deutsches Ärzteblatt International. 2014;111(7):107–116. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hardy JD, Webb WR, Dalton ML, Jr, Walker GR, Jr. Lung homotransplantation in man: Report of the initial case. JAMA. 1963;186(12):1065–1074. - PubMed
    1. Cooper DKC. Transplantation of the heart and both lungs: I. Historical review. Thorax. 1969;24(4):383–390. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Reitz BA, Wallwork JL, Hunt SA, et al. Heart-Lung Transplantation. New England Journal of Medicine. 1982;306(10):557–564. - PubMed
    1. Group* TLT. Unilateral Lung Transplantation for Pulmonary Fibrosis. New England Journal of Medicine. 1986;314(18):1140–1145. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources