Post-Acute Care After Joint Replacement in Medicare's Bundled Payments for Care Improvement Initiative
- PMID: 30802938
- DOI: 10.1111/jgs.15803
Post-Acute Care After Joint Replacement in Medicare's Bundled Payments for Care Improvement Initiative
Abstract
Importance: Bundled payments, in which services provided around a care episode are linked together, are being tested under Medicare's Bundled Payments for Care Improvement (BPCI) program. Reducing post-acute care (PAC) is critical under bundled payment, but little is known about whether this is done through provider selection or consolidation, and whether particular patterns of changes in PAC are associated with success under the program.
Objective: To characterize patterns of change in PAC under lower-extremity joint replacement episodes in BPCI.
Design: Retrospective difference-in-differences study.
Setting: US Medicare, 2013 to 2015.
Participants: A total of 264 US hospitals participating in BPCI for lower-extremity joint replacement and matched controls.
Exposures: Participation in BPCI.
Measurements: Use and duration of institutional PAC (proportion discharged to a skilled nursing facility, an inpatient rehabilitation facility, and a long-term care hospital), dispersion of PAC (proportion of discharges to commonly used providers), and quality of PAC (Star Ratings, readmission rates, length of stay, and nurse staffing); part A Medicare payments.
Results: BPCI participants decreased the use and duration of institutional PAC compared to controls: overall institutional PAC declined 4.4% in BPCI hospitals vs 2.1% in non-BPCI hospitals (difference = -2.2%; P = .033), and duration decreased by 1.6 days in BPCI hospitals compared to 0.0 days in non-BPCI hospitals (difference in differences = -1.5 days; P < .001). However, BPCI participants did not change their PAC referral patterns to reduce dispersion or refer patients to higher-quality PAC providers. Hospitals that were more successful in reducing Medicare payments started with higher payments and higher use of institutional PAC settings and demonstrated greater drops in use and duration of institutional PAC, but no differences in dispersion or referral to high-quality providers.
Conclusions and relevance: Reductions in spending under BPCI were driven by a shift from higher- to lower-cost discharge settings, and by shortening the duration of institutional PAC. Hospitals that reduced payments the most had the highest spending at baseline. J Am Geriatr Soc 67:1027-1035, 2019.
Keywords: Medicare; bundled payments; costs; health policy.
© 2019 The American Geriatrics Society.
Comment in
-
Preferred Post-Acute Care Providers in Bundled Payment: Implications for Patient Choice.J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019 May;67(5):1020-1022. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15806. Epub 2019 Feb 23. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019. PMID: 30801658 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
How Do Frail Medicare Beneficiaries Fare Under Bundled Payments?J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019 Nov;67(11):2245-2253. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16147. Epub 2019 Sep 6. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019. PMID: 31490547
-
Cost of Joint Replacement Using Bundled Payment Models.JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Feb 1;177(2):214-222. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.8263. JAMA Intern Med. 2017. PMID: 28055062
-
Bundled Payments for Care Improvement: Health System Experience With Lower Extremity Joint Replacement at Higher and Lower Volume Hospitals.J Arthroplasty. 2019 Oct;34(10):2284-2289. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.05.011. Epub 2019 May 13. J Arthroplasty. 2019. PMID: 31176563
-
Effect of Bundled Payments and Health Care Reform as Alternative Payment Models in Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Clinical Review.J Arthroplasty. 2017 Aug;32(8):2590-2597. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.03.027. Epub 2017 Mar 20. J Arthroplasty. 2017. PMID: 28438453 Review.
-
The Impact Of Bundled Payment On Health Care Spending, Utilization, And Quality: A Systematic Review.Health Aff (Millwood). 2020 Jan;39(1):50-57. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2019.00784. Health Aff (Millwood). 2020. PMID: 31905061
Cited by
-
Trends in Postacute Care Use and Outcomes After Hip and Knee Replacements in Dual-Eligible Medicare and Medicaid Beneficiaries, 2013-2016.JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Mar 2;3(3):e200368. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.0368. JAMA Netw Open. 2020. PMID: 32129866 Free PMC article.
-
Year 1 of the Bundled Payments for Care Improvement-Advanced Model.N Engl J Med. 2021 Aug 12;385(7):618-627. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa2033678. N Engl J Med. 2021. PMID: 34379923 Free PMC article.
-
Association of Physician Group Practice Participation in Bundled Payments With Patient Selection, Costs, and Outcomes for Joint Replacement.JAMA Health Forum. 2021 May 6;2(5):e210295. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2021.0295. eCollection 2021 May. JAMA Health Forum. 2021. PMID: 35977307 Free PMC article.
-
Medicare's bundled payment model did not change skilled nursing facility discharge patterns.Am J Manag Care. 2019 Jul;25(7):329-334. Am J Manag Care. 2019. PMID: 31318505 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of Medicare eligibility on informal caregiving for surgery and stroke.Health Serv Res. 2023 Feb;58(1):128-139. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14019. Epub 2022 Jul 14. Health Serv Res. 2023. PMID: 35791447 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical