Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jan-Dec:13:1753944719826335.
doi: 10.1177/1753944719826335.

Comparative preclinical evaluation of a polymer-free sirolimus-eluting stent in porcine coronary arteries

Affiliations

Comparative preclinical evaluation of a polymer-free sirolimus-eluting stent in porcine coronary arteries

Christian Sperling et al. Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis. 2019 Jan-Dec.

Abstract

Background:: Polymer-free drug-eluting stents (DES) without permanent-polymer coating may be associated with rapid vessel healing, providing a rationale to reduce dual-antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). The aim of the current study was to compare vessel healing of a polymer-free sirolimus-eluting stent (PF-SES), its bare metal stent (BMS) analogue to a permanent polymer-based sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) with proven effectiveness in porcine coronary arteries.

Material and methods:: An ultrathin-strut cobalt-chromium PF-SES, its BMS analogue and an SES with a permanent polymer were used to study vessel healing and their antistenotic potential. Stents were implanted in porcine coronary arteries for histopathologic analysis at 7, 28 and 180 days. In an additional in vitro study, the thrombogenicity of PF-SES was compared with a fluoropolymer-coated everolimus-eluting stent (EES) which demonstrated low stent thrombosis rates in numerous studies.

Results:: In the animal study, neointimal growth and injury scores were minimal and inflammation scores were low in the neointima and adventitia in all study groups. After 28 days, neointimal area was lowest in PF-SES when compared with SES and BMS (1.48 ± 0.55 mm² versus 2.43 ± 0.69 mm² versus 1.90 ± 0.85 mm², respectively, p < 0.05) and endothelialization of luminal surfaces was nearly complete in all groups, though SES show the least coverage with occasional adherent luminal inflammatory cells ( p > 0.05). At 180 days, neointimal area and thickness were most pronounced in SES ( p < 0.05) and comparable with BMS implantations, which were characterized by nearly completed vessel healing. PF-SES and BMS had complete endothelialization, absence of fibrin and sustained low inflammatory reaction when compared with the permanent polymer-based SES (inflammation score: PF-SES 0.41 ± 0.74 versus SES 2.52 ± 1.72 versus BMS 0.30 ± 0.65, respectively, p < 0.05 BMS versus SES). Granuloma formation and fibrin accumulation were most pronounced in SES but did not reach statistical significance, p > 0.05). In the in vitro thrombogenicity study, the PF-SES confirmed comparable antithrombogenic properties with regard to the parameters fibrin and platelet binding, and platelet aggregation when compared with the EES.

Conclusions:: As compared with BMS, the ultrathin-strut cobalt-chromium PF-SES showed similar endothelialization at 28 days and comparable healing characteristics at 180 days efficacious inhibition of neointimal proliferation in porcine coronary arteries with low inflammation responses and a BMS-like endothelialization at 180 days. In addition, in an in vitro model, the PF-SES also confirmed low thrombogenicity as compared with the EES.

Keywords: all-comers population; polymer-free; porcine model; preclinical; sirolimus; ultra-thin strut bare metal stent.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest statement: Except for FK (lecturing fees) and CS/MWW (full-time employment at Medical Scientific Affairs, B. Braun Melsungen AG) there are no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Panels stained by Movat, with twofold magnification. Panel (a) at 7 days; panel (b): 28 days, panel (c): 180 days. BMS, bare metal stent; PF-SES, polymer-free sirolimus-eluting stent.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Representative SEM images of EES and PF-SES, magnification ×350. Representative SEM images of EES (left panel: EES with fibrin strands) and PF-SES (right panel: PF-SES with some small spots of fibrin), magnification ×350. BMS, bare metal stent; EES, everolimus-eluting stent; PF-SES, polymer-free sirolimus-eluting stent; SEM, scanning electron microscopy.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
OCT images of PF-SES in the LAD-7 of a 75-year-old patient. The PF-SES used is the Coroflex® ISAR 2.75 mm. Left panel: OCT post-PCI; right panel: OCT follow up at 6 weeks. PF-SES, polymer-free sirolimus-eluting stent; OCT, optical coherence tomography; LAD-7, ; PCI, .

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Windecker S, Kolh P, Alfonso F, et al. 2014 ESC/EACTS guidelines on myocardial revascularization: the task force on myocardial revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS) developed with the special contribution of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI). Eur Heart J 2014; 35: 2541–2619. - PubMed
    1. Urban P, Meredith IT, Abizaid A, et al. Polymer-free drug-coated coronary stents in patients at high bleeding risk. N Engl J Med 2015; 373: 2038–2047. - PubMed
    1. Valgimigli M, Patialiakas A, Thury A, et al. Zotarolimus-eluting versus bare-metal stents in uncertain drug-eluting stent candidates. J Am Coll Cardiol 2015; 65: 805–815. - PubMed
    1. Varenne O, Cook S, Sideris G, et al. Drug-eluting stents in elderly patients with coronary artery disease (SENIOR): a randomised single-blind trial. Lancet 2018; 391: 41–50. - PubMed
    1. Wilson GJ, McGregor J, Conditt G, et al. Impact of Bioresorbable versus permanent polymer on long-term vessel wall inflammation and healing: a comparative drug eluting stent experimental study. EuroIntervention 2018; 13: 1670–1679. - PubMed