Comparative preclinical evaluation of a polymer-free sirolimus-eluting stent in porcine coronary arteries
- PMID: 30803407
- PMCID: PMC6376525
- DOI: 10.1177/1753944719826335
Comparative preclinical evaluation of a polymer-free sirolimus-eluting stent in porcine coronary arteries
Abstract
Background:: Polymer-free drug-eluting stents (DES) without permanent-polymer coating may be associated with rapid vessel healing, providing a rationale to reduce dual-antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). The aim of the current study was to compare vessel healing of a polymer-free sirolimus-eluting stent (PF-SES), its bare metal stent (BMS) analogue to a permanent polymer-based sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) with proven effectiveness in porcine coronary arteries.
Material and methods:: An ultrathin-strut cobalt-chromium PF-SES, its BMS analogue and an SES with a permanent polymer were used to study vessel healing and their antistenotic potential. Stents were implanted in porcine coronary arteries for histopathologic analysis at 7, 28 and 180 days. In an additional in vitro study, the thrombogenicity of PF-SES was compared with a fluoropolymer-coated everolimus-eluting stent (EES) which demonstrated low stent thrombosis rates in numerous studies.
Results:: In the animal study, neointimal growth and injury scores were minimal and inflammation scores were low in the neointima and adventitia in all study groups. After 28 days, neointimal area was lowest in PF-SES when compared with SES and BMS (1.48 ± 0.55 mm² versus 2.43 ± 0.69 mm² versus 1.90 ± 0.85 mm², respectively, p < 0.05) and endothelialization of luminal surfaces was nearly complete in all groups, though SES show the least coverage with occasional adherent luminal inflammatory cells ( p > 0.05). At 180 days, neointimal area and thickness were most pronounced in SES ( p < 0.05) and comparable with BMS implantations, which were characterized by nearly completed vessel healing. PF-SES and BMS had complete endothelialization, absence of fibrin and sustained low inflammatory reaction when compared with the permanent polymer-based SES (inflammation score: PF-SES 0.41 ± 0.74 versus SES 2.52 ± 1.72 versus BMS 0.30 ± 0.65, respectively, p < 0.05 BMS versus SES). Granuloma formation and fibrin accumulation were most pronounced in SES but did not reach statistical significance, p > 0.05). In the in vitro thrombogenicity study, the PF-SES confirmed comparable antithrombogenic properties with regard to the parameters fibrin and platelet binding, and platelet aggregation when compared with the EES.
Conclusions:: As compared with BMS, the ultrathin-strut cobalt-chromium PF-SES showed similar endothelialization at 28 days and comparable healing characteristics at 180 days efficacious inhibition of neointimal proliferation in porcine coronary arteries with low inflammation responses and a BMS-like endothelialization at 180 days. In addition, in an in vitro model, the PF-SES also confirmed low thrombogenicity as compared with the EES.
Keywords: all-comers population; polymer-free; porcine model; preclinical; sirolimus; ultra-thin strut bare metal stent.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures



Similar articles
-
Comparable vascular response of a new generation sirolimus eluting stents when compared to fluoropolymer everolimus eluting stents in the porcine coronary restenosis model.Cardiol J. 2016;23(6):657-666. doi: 10.5603/CJ.2016.0108. Cardiol J. 2016. PMID: 27976797
-
First-in-human evaluation of a bioabsorbable polymer-coated sirolimus-eluting stent: imaging and clinical results of the DESSOLVE I Trial (DES with sirolimus and a bioabsorbable polymer for the treatment of patients with de novo lesion in the native coronary arteries).JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Oct;6(10):1026-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.05.013. Epub 2013 Sep 18. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013. PMID: 24055443 Clinical Trial.
-
Experimental evaluation of efficacy and healing response of everolimus-eluting stents in the familial hypercholesterolemic swine model: a comparative study of bioabsorbable versus durable polymer stent platforms.Coron Artery Dis. 2014 May;25(3):198-207. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0000000000000099. Coron Artery Dis. 2014. PMID: 24642807
-
Stent thrombosis with drug-eluting stents: is the paradigm shifting?J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Nov 19;62(21):1915-1921. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.08.725. Epub 2013 Sep 11. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013. PMID: 24036025 Review.
-
The significance of preclinical evaluation of sirolimus-, paclitaxel-, and zotarolimus-eluting stents.Am J Cardiol. 2007 Oct 22;100(8B):36M-44M. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2007.08.020. Am J Cardiol. 2007. PMID: 17950831 Review.
Cited by
-
Unrestricted use of polymer-free sirolimus eluting stents in routine clinical practice.Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Feb;99(8):e19119. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000019119. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020. PMID: 32080086 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Development and Validation of a Bioanalytical LC-MS/MS Method for Simultaneous Determination of Sirolimus in Porcine Whole Blood and Lung Tissue and Pharmacokinetic Application with Coronary Stents.Molecules. 2021 Jan 15;26(2):425. doi: 10.3390/molecules26020425. Molecules. 2021. PMID: 33467464 Free PMC article.
-
Real-World Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Following Polymer-Free Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Implantations to Treat Coronary Artery Disease.Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2020 Jun;34(3):335-344. doi: 10.1007/s10557-020-06963-5. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2020. PMID: 32212061 Free PMC article.
-
Polymer-free sirolimus-eluting stent use in Europe and Asia: Ethnic differences in demographics and clinical outcomes.PLoS One. 2020 Jan 13;15(1):e0226606. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226606. eCollection 2020. PLoS One. 2020. PMID: 31929543 Free PMC article.
-
A GLP-1 Analog Liraglutide Reduces Intimal Hyperplasia After Coronary Stent Implantation via Regulation of Glycemic Variability and NLRP3 Inflammasome/IL-10 Signaling in Diabetic Swine.Front Pharmacol. 2020 Mar 26;11:372. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2020.00372. eCollection 2020. Front Pharmacol. 2020. PMID: 32273846 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Windecker S, Kolh P, Alfonso F, et al. 2014 ESC/EACTS guidelines on myocardial revascularization: the task force on myocardial revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS) developed with the special contribution of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI). Eur Heart J 2014; 35: 2541–2619. - PubMed
-
- Urban P, Meredith IT, Abizaid A, et al. Polymer-free drug-coated coronary stents in patients at high bleeding risk. N Engl J Med 2015; 373: 2038–2047. - PubMed
-
- Valgimigli M, Patialiakas A, Thury A, et al. Zotarolimus-eluting versus bare-metal stents in uncertain drug-eluting stent candidates. J Am Coll Cardiol 2015; 65: 805–815. - PubMed
-
- Varenne O, Cook S, Sideris G, et al. Drug-eluting stents in elderly patients with coronary artery disease (SENIOR): a randomised single-blind trial. Lancet 2018; 391: 41–50. - PubMed
-
- Wilson GJ, McGregor J, Conditt G, et al. Impact of Bioresorbable versus permanent polymer on long-term vessel wall inflammation and healing: a comparative drug eluting stent experimental study. EuroIntervention 2018; 13: 1670–1679. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials