Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jul;46(4):617-631.
doi: 10.1017/S0305000918000600. Epub 2019 Feb 26.

Novel word learning at 21 months predicts receptive vocabulary outcomes in later childhood

Affiliations

Novel word learning at 21 months predicts receptive vocabulary outcomes in later childhood

Vinaya Rajan et al. J Child Lang. 2019 Jul.

Abstract

Several aspects of early language skills, including parent-report measures of vocabulary, phoneme discrimination, speech segmentation, and speed of lexical access predict later childhood language outcomes. To date, no studies have examined the long-term predictive validity of novel word learning. We examined whether individual differences in novel word learning at 21 months predict later childhood receptive vocabulary outcomes rather than generalized cognitive abilities. Twenty-eight 21-month-olds were taught novel words using a modified version of the Intermodal Preferential Looking Paradigm. Seventeen children (range 7-10 years) returned to participate in a longitudinal follow-up. Novel word learning in infancy uniquely accounted for 22% of the variance in childhood receptive vocabulary but did not predict later childhood visuospatial ability or non-verbal IQ. These results suggest that the ability to associate novel sound patterns to novel objects, an index of the process of word learning, may be especially important for long-term language mastery.

Keywords: infancy; language development; novel word learning.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Altepeter TS (1989). The PPVT-R as a measure of psycholinguistic functioning: a caution. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 45, 935–941. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(198911)45:6<935::AID-JCLP2270450618>3.0.CO;2-H - DOI - PubMed
    1. Axelsson EL, & Horst JS (2013). Testing a word is not a test of word learning. Acta Psychologica, 144, 264–268. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.07.002 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bates E, Bretherton I, & Snyder L (1988). From first words to grammar: Individual differences and dissociable mechanisms. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    1. Benasich AA, & Tallal P (2002). Infant discrimination of rapid auditory cues predict later language impairment. Behavioural Brain Research, 136, 31–49. doi:10.1016/S0166-4328(02)00098-0 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bernhardt BM, Kemp N, & Werker JF (2007). Early word-object associations and later language development. First Language, 27, 315–328. doi:10.1177/0142723707081652 - DOI

Publication types