The iPROMOS protocol: a stepped-wedge study to implement routine patient-reported outcomes in a medical oncology outpatient setting
- PMID: 30804038
- PMCID: PMC6443070
- DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027046
The iPROMOS protocol: a stepped-wedge study to implement routine patient-reported outcomes in a medical oncology outpatient setting
Abstract
Introduction: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are data capture tools that collect information directly from patients. Several large research studies provide evidence that the use of PROMs in routine care provides benefits to mortality and morbidity outcomes in medical oncology patients. Despite this, implementation of PROMs in daily clinical routine is slow and challenging.
Methods and analysis: This study will use a stepped-wedge design to assess the implementation of a PROM intervention in highly frequented medical oncology outpatient clinics. During a lead-in period of 4 weeks, control data will be collected. The intervention will then be implemented for 4 weeks in Clinic 1 initially, then in Clinic 2 for another 4 weeks. 500 patient encounters will be measured over the 12 weeks in total. The process of implementation will be informed and evaluated using the Medical Research Council Guidelines for Implementing Complex Interventions. The study will be guided by the Promoting Action Research in Health Services framework approach for implementation. The intervention and implementation outcomes will be measured using qualitative and quantitative data.
Ethics and dissemination: Ethical approval has been obtained, approval number HREC/16/QRBW/100 by the Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital Human Research Ethics Committee. Results will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals and at scientific meetings.
Trial registration: ACTRN12618000398202. Trial Status: Opened on 25 March 2018 and will continue until 12 months after the last PROMs reporting encounter.
Keywords: PRO-CTCAE; PROMs; complex intervention; iPARIHS; implementation.
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: None to declared.
Similar articles
-
The utility of the implementation science framework "Integrated Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services" (i-PARIHS) and the facilitator role for introducing patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in a medical oncology outpatient department.Qual Life Res. 2021 Nov;30(11):3063-3071. doi: 10.1007/s11136-020-02669-1. Epub 2020 Oct 21. Qual Life Res. 2021. PMID: 33089474 Free PMC article.
-
Implementation of Patient-Reported Outcomes in a Medical Oncology Setting (the iPROMOS Study): Type II Hybrid Implementation Study.J Med Internet Res. 2024 Aug 27;26:e55841. doi: 10.2196/55841. J Med Internet Res. 2024. PMID: 39190468 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Patient Reported Outcome Measures in cancer care: a hybrid effectiveness-Implementation trial to optimise Symptom control and health service Experience (PROMISE)-protocol for a randomised controlled trial of electronic self-reporting of symptoms versus usual care during and following treatment in patients with cancer.BMJ Open. 2024 Nov 19;14(11):e090836. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090836. BMJ Open. 2024. PMID: 39566946 Free PMC article.
-
Improving patient outcomes through the routine use of patient-reported data in cancer clinics: future directions.Psychooncology. 2009 Nov;18(11):1129-38. doi: 10.1002/pon.1545. Psychooncology. 2009. PMID: 19319920 Review.
-
A systematic review of randomised controlled trials evaluating the use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs).Qual Life Res. 2019 Mar;28(3):567-592. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-2016-z. Epub 2018 Oct 3. Qual Life Res. 2019. PMID: 30284183
Cited by
-
The utility of the implementation science framework "Integrated Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services" (i-PARIHS) and the facilitator role for introducing patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in a medical oncology outpatient department.Qual Life Res. 2021 Nov;30(11):3063-3071. doi: 10.1007/s11136-020-02669-1. Epub 2020 Oct 21. Qual Life Res. 2021. PMID: 33089474 Free PMC article.
-
Routine provision of feedback from patient-reported outcome measurements to healthcare providers and patients in clinical practice.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Oct 12;10(10):CD011589. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011589.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021. PMID: 34637526 Free PMC article.
-
Community-based alcohol education intervention (THEATRE) study to reduce harmful effects of alcohol in rural Sri Lanka: design and adaptation of a mixed-methods stepped wedge cluster randomised control trial.BMJ Open. 2023 Jun 15;13(6):e064722. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064722. BMJ Open. 2023. PMID: 37321807 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Implementation of electronic prospective surveillance models in cancer care: a scoping review.Implement Sci. 2023 Apr 26;18(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s13012-023-01265-4. Implement Sci. 2023. PMID: 37101231 Free PMC article.
-
Implementation of Patient-Reported Outcomes in a Medical Oncology Setting (the iPROMOS Study): Type II Hybrid Implementation Study.J Med Internet Res. 2024 Aug 27;26:e55841. doi: 10.2196/55841. J Med Internet Res. 2024. PMID: 39190468 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
References
-
- Coons SJ, Gwaltney CJ, Hays RD, et al. . Recommendations on evidence needed to support measurement equivalence between electronic and paper-based patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures: ISPOR ePRO Good Research Practices Task Force report. Value Health 2009;12:419–29. 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00470.x - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources