Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Feb 11:7:18.
doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2019.00018. eCollection 2019.

Improving Reproducibility in Synthetic Biology

Affiliations

Improving Reproducibility in Synthetic Biology

Mathew M Jessop-Fabre et al. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. .

Abstract

Synthetic biology holds great promise to deliver transformative technologies to the world in the coming years. However, several challenges still remain to be addressed before it can deliver on its promises. One of the most important issues to address is the lack of reproducibility within research of the life sciences. This problem is beginning to be recognised by the community and solutions are being developed to tackle the problem. The recent emergence of automated facilities that are open for use by researchers (such as biofoundries and cloud labs) may be one of the ways that synthetic biologists can improve the quality and reproducibility of their work. In this perspective article, we outline these and some of the other technologies that are currently being developed which we believe may help to transform how synthetic biologists approach their research activities.

Keywords: automation; biofoundry; cloud lab; reproducibility; synthetic biology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Moving towards automation in the Design-Test-Build-Learn cycle for enhancing the throughput and reliability of biological experimentation.

References

    1. Arkin A. (2008). Setting the standard in synthetic biology. Nat. Biotechnol. 26:771. 10.1038/nbt0708-771 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Baker M. (2016). 1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility. Nature 533, 452–454. 10.1038/533452a - DOI - PubMed
    1. Balagaddé F. K., You L., Hansen C. L., Arnold F. H., Quake S. R. (2005). Long-term monitoring of bacteria undergoing programmed population control in a microchemostat. Science 309, 137–140. 10.1126/science.1109173 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Begley C. G., Ellis L. M. (2012). Raise standards for preclinical cancer research. Nature 483:531. 10.1038/483531a - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ben Yehezkel T., Rival A, Raz O., Cohen R., Marx Z., Camara M., et al. . (2016). Synthesis and cell-free cloning of DNA libraries using programmable microfluidics. Nucleic Acids Res. 44:e35. 10.1093/nar/gkv1087 - DOI - PMC - PubMed