A Systematic Review of the Existing Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 (PI-RADSv2) Literature and Subset Meta-Analysis of PI-RADSv2 Categories Stratified by Gleason Scores
- PMID: 30807218
- DOI: 10.2214/AJR.18.20571
A Systematic Review of the Existing Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 (PI-RADSv2) Literature and Subset Meta-Analysis of PI-RADSv2 Categories Stratified by Gleason Scores
Abstract
Objective: The objective of this study was to quantitatively and qualitatively assess the methodologic heterogeneity of the current Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2 (PI-RADSv2) literature and estimate the proportions of Gleason scores (GSs) diagnosed across PI-RADSv2 categories.
Materials and methods: This study was a systematic review and meta-analysis and was performed in concordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Only English-language studies and studies published before April 1, 2018, were assessed. The primary outcome of the meta-analysis was the estimated percentage of patients with GS ≥ 3 + 4 within each individual PI-RADSv2 score. We calculated the pooled estimates and 95% CIs on the basis of a random-effects model using the meta-analysis routine of Stata (version 13.1).
Results: Our search revealed 434 titles, and 59 of these studies were selected. These studies were remarkable for their technical and terminological diverseness. Thirteen studies had sufficient data to be included in the meta-analysis. The prevalence of ≥ GS 3 + 4 in lesions assigned a PI-RADSv2 score of 3 or higher was approximately 45%. Lesions assigned PI-RADSv2 scores 1 or 2, 3, 4, and 5 represented high-grade disease in approximately 6%, 12%, 48%, and 72% of patients.
Conclusion: The data available in the literature are highly heterogeneous and challenging to analyze because of variations in terminology, patient cohort selection, criteria, imaging parameters, and reference standards. In spite of this heterogeneity, our meta-analysis shows that PI-RADSv2 has good sensitivity when a score of ≥ 3 is considered as a positive test.
Keywords: Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS); Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2 (PI-RADSv2); multiparametric MRI (mpMRI); prostate imaging.
Similar articles
-
Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System, Version 2, Assessment Categories and Pathologic Outcomes in Patients With Gleason Score 3 + 4 = 7 Prostate Cancer Diagnosed at Biopsy.AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 May;208(5):1037-1044. doi: 10.2214/AJR.16.16843. Epub 2017 Mar 7. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017. PMID: 28267359
-
Comparison of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System versions 1 and 2 for the Detection of Peripheral Zone Gleason Score 3 + 4 = 7 Cancers.AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 Dec;209(6):W365-W373. doi: 10.2214/AJR.17.17964. Epub 2017 Oct 5. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017. PMID: 28981356
-
Is Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 Sufficiently Discovering Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer? Per-Lesion Radiology-Pathology Correlation Study.AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018 Jul;211(1):114-120. doi: 10.2214/AJR.17.18684. Epub 2018 Apr 27. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018. PMID: 29702017
-
Cancer detection rates of the PI-RADSv2.1 assessment categories: systematic review and meta-analysis on lesion level and patient level.Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2022 Feb;25(2):256-263. doi: 10.1038/s41391-021-00417-1. Epub 2021 Jul 6. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2022. PMID: 34230616 Free PMC article.
-
PI-RADSv2: How we do it.J Magn Reson Imaging. 2017 Jul;46(1):11-23. doi: 10.1002/jmri.25645. Epub 2017 Feb 25. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2017. PMID: 28236334 Review.
Cited by
-
PSMA PET-CT in the Diagnosis and Staging of Prostate Cancer.Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Oct 26;12(11):2594. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12112594. Diagnostics (Basel). 2022. PMID: 36359439 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Variability of the Positive Predictive Value of PI-RADS for Prostate MRI across 26 Centers: Experience of the Society of Abdominal Radiology Prostate Cancer Disease-focused Panel.Radiology. 2020 Jul;296(1):76-84. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020190646. Epub 2020 Apr 21. Radiology. 2020. PMID: 32315265 Free PMC article.
-
PI-RADS Steering Committee: The PI-RADS Multiparametric MRI and MRI-directed Biopsy Pathway.Radiology. 2019 Aug;292(2):464-474. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2019182946. Epub 2019 Jun 11. Radiology. 2019. PMID: 31184561 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The use of prostate MR for targeting prostate biopsies.BJR Open. 2019 Jun 19;1(1):20180044. doi: 10.1259/bjro.20180044. eCollection 2019. BJR Open. 2019. PMID: 33178929 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Reduction of false positives using zone-specific prostate-specific antigen density for prostate MRI-based biopsy decision strategies.Eur Radiol. 2024 Oct;34(10):6229-6240. doi: 10.1007/s00330-024-10700-z. Epub 2024 Mar 28. Eur Radiol. 2024. PMID: 38538841 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous