Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 May;143(5):1099e-1105e.
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000005536.

Performance on the Plastic Surgery In-Service Examination Can Predict Success on the American Board of Plastic Surgery Written Examination

John A Girotto  1 , Nicholas S Adams  1 , Jeffrey E Janis  1 , Keith E Brandt  1 , Sheri S Slezak  1
Affiliations

Performance on the Plastic Surgery In-Service Examination Can Predict Success on the American Board of Plastic Surgery Written Examination

John A Girotto et al. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019 May.

Abstract

Background: Originally developed for resident self-assessment, the Plastic Surgery In-Service Examination has been administered for over 45 years. The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education requires that at least 70 percent of graduates pass the American Board of Plastic Surgery Written Examination on their first attempt. This study evaluates the role of In-Service Exam scores in predicting Written Exam success.

Methods: In-Service Exam scores from 2009 to 2015 were collected from the National Board of Medical Examiners. Data included residency training track, training year, and examination year. Written Exam data were gathered from the American Board of Plastic Surgery. Multivariate analysis was performed and receiver operating characteristic curves were used to identify optimal In-Service Exam score cut-points for Written Exam success.

Results: Data from 1364 residents were included. Residents who failed the Written Exam had significantly lower In-Service Exam scores than those who passed (p < 0.001). Independent residents were 7.0 times more likely to fail compared with integrated/combined residents (p < 0.001). Residents who scored above the optimal cut-points were significantly more likely to pass the Written Exam. The optimal cut-point score for independent residents was the thirty-sixth percentile and the twenty-second percentile for integrated/combined residents.

Conclusions: Plastic Surgery In-Service Exam scores can predict success on the American Board of Plastic Surgery Written Exam. Residents who score below the cut-points are at an increased risk of failing. These data can help identify residents at risk for early intervention.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

    1. American Council for Graduate Medical Education. ACGME program requirements for graduate medical education in plastic surgery. Available at: https://www.acgme.org/Portals/0/PFAssets/ProgramRequirements/360_plastic.... Accessed December 23, 2017.
    1. Brotherton SE, Etzel SI. Graduate medical education, 2008-2009. JAMA 2009;302:1357–1372.
    1. Perkins NJ, Schisterman EF. The inconsistency of “optimal” cutpoints obtained using two criteria based on the receiver operating characteristic curve. Am J Epidemiol. 2006;163:670–675.
    1. Shellito JL, Osland JS, Helmer SD, Chang FC. American Board of Surgery examinations: Can we identify surgery residency applicants and residents who will pass the examinations on the first attempt? Am J Surg. 2010;199:216–222.
    1. Klein GR, Austin MS, Randolph S, Sharkey PF, Hilibrand AS. Passing the boards: Can USMLE and Orthopaedic in-Training Examination scores predict passage of the ABOS Part-I examination? J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86:1092–1095.

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources