Implants in the Posterior Maxilla: Open Sinus Lift Versus Conventional Implant Placement. A Systematic Review
- PMID: 30807622
- DOI: 10.11607/jomi.7274
Implants in the Posterior Maxilla: Open Sinus Lift Versus Conventional Implant Placement. A Systematic Review
Abstract
Objective: To compare implant survival, marginal bone loss, peri-implant clinical parameters, and complications in dental implants placed in the posterior maxilla in native bone or after grafting using the open sinus lift technique.
Materials and methods: A search was made of two electronic databases (MEDLINE via PubMed and the Cochrane Oral Health Group Trials Register [CENTRAL]), complemented by a manual search. The study included randomized clinical trials, non-randomized clinical trials, and observational studies such as cohort studies and case-control studies conducted on a prospective or retrospective basis and comparing the placement of standard length implants (≥ 10 mm) in native bone or after grafting using the sinus lift procedure. Risk of bias was evaluated with the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool and the methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS).
Results: The search yielded 90 studies, of which 23 were included. Two studies were evaluated with the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool, with neither being identified as presenting low risk of bias. Twenty-one studies were evaluated by the MINORS, yielding a mean score of 15.66 points out of 24. The implant survival rate in the control group was 90% to 100% versus 75.3% to 100% in the test group over a follow-up period of 6 to 120 months. Most studies revealed no statistically significant differences. In most of the publications, marginal bone loss was greater in the test group than in the control group, though without reaching statistical significance. Similar results were obtained in both groups with regard to the peri-implant clinical parameters. There were more surgical complications in the test group than in the control group-such complications being inherent to the sinus lift procedure.
Conclusion: Implant placement after sinus lift affords results in terms of implant survival, marginal bone loss, and peri-implant clinical parameters similar to those obtained with conventional implant placement in native bone. However, there is a greater incidence of surgical complications associated with the sinus lift procedure.
Comment in
-
Dental Implant Survival in the Bone Augmented by Direct Sinus Lift Is Comparable to Implants Placed in the Native Bone.J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2020 Mar;20(1):101410. doi: 10.1016/j.jebdp.2020.101410. Epub 2020 Feb 20. J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2020. PMID: 32381412
Similar articles
-
Rehabilitation of the Atrophic Posterior Maxilla Using Splinted Short Implants or Sinus Augmentation with Standard-Length Implants: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2016 Sep-Oct;31(5):1179-88. doi: 10.11607/jomi.4370. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2016. PMID: 27632276
-
Clinical evaluation of modified transalveolar sinus floor elevation and osteotome sinus floor elevation in posterior maxillae: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.Trials. 2018 Sep 14;19(1):489. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2879-x. Trials. 2018. PMID: 30217227 Free PMC article.
-
Implant placement in the atrophic posterior maxilla with sinus elevation without bone grafting: a 2-year prospective study.Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2013 Mar-Apr;28(2):526-30. doi: 10.11607/jomi.2249. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2013. PMID: 23527355
-
Long-term effectiveness of maxillary sinus floor augmentation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.J Clin Periodontol. 2019 Jun;46 Suppl 21:307-318. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.13055. J Clin Periodontol. 2019. PMID: 30624789
-
Short versus standard implants at sinus augmented sites: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Clin Oral Investig. 2022 Nov;26(11):6681-6698. doi: 10.1007/s00784-022-04628-1. Epub 2022 Sep 7. Clin Oral Investig. 2022. PMID: 36070150 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Nanostructured Calcium-Incorporated Surface Compared to Machined and SLA Dental Implants-A Split-Mouth Randomized Case/Double-Control Histological Human Study.Nanomaterials (Basel). 2023 Jan 16;13(2):357. doi: 10.3390/nano13020357. Nanomaterials (Basel). 2023. PMID: 36678110 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical outcomes of dental implants placed in the augmented maxillary sinus: A 5-year retrospective study.Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2025 Feb 20;22:8. doi: 10.4103/drj.drj_96_24. eCollection 2025. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2025. PMID: 40028504 Free PMC article.
-
Two-Step Progressive Transcrestal Sinus Augmentation Using a 4.5 mm Unloaded Implant as a "Temporary Implant" in Highly Atrophic Ridge: Case Report.Eur J Dent. 2023 May;17(2):560-566. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1755557. Epub 2023 Jan 25. Eur J Dent. 2023. PMID: 36696916 Free PMC article.
-
Implant survival after graftless sinus floor augmentation in highly atrophic maxillae: a randomized controlled trial in a split mouth study.Int J Implant Dent. 2021 Oct 18;7(1):107. doi: 10.1186/s40729-021-00387-y. Int J Implant Dent. 2021. PMID: 34661774 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Are mucous retention cysts and pseudocysts in the maxillary sinus a risk factor for dental implants? A systematic review.Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2021 May 1;26(3):e276-e283. doi: 10.4317/medoral.24155. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2021. PMID: 33247569 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources