Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Dec;33(12):4089-4097.
doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06711-3. Epub 2019 Feb 26.

Physician opinions on decision making for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) feeding tube placement

Affiliations

Physician opinions on decision making for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) feeding tube placement

Theresa A Fessler et al. Surg Endosc. 2019 Dec.

Abstract

Background: Percutaneous endoscopically placed gastrostomy (PEG) tubes are useful for long-term enteral nutrition; however, they are associated with lack of benefit for patients with advanced dementia, at end of life, and for some stroke patients with early regain of swallowing function. We surveyed physician opinions on decision making with the aim to identify factors that can lead to inappropriate PEG placement, as a first step of a quality improvement initiative to prevent inappropriate PEG placements at our facility.

Methods: A survey was distributed to 231 physicians, with questions about discussion topics, contraindications, responsibilities, and practices in decision making for PEG placement. Five-point Likert scales were used for most responses.

Results: Of 62 respondents, the majority were general surgeons (51.6%) and neurologists (30.6%). Levels of agreement were very low that PEG placement is contraindicated in advanced dementia (> 56% disagreed) and at end of life (55% disagreed) with scores of 2.4 and 2.5 (out of 5), respectively. Agreement level was low (score of 2.85) for delaying PEG for stroke patients by at least 2 weeks. Agreement was high for the discussion topics, for allowing 1-7 days for processing information, and for consulting the nutrition service. Over 98% of respondents chose primary team and 58% chose both primary and endoscopy teams as being responsible for discussions with patients and care partners in the decision-making process.

Conclusions: Greater awareness is needed of the lack of benefit of PEG feeding in advanced dementia, at end of life, and for some stroke patients with early regain of swallow function. Disagreement exists as to whether the primary team and endoscopist share in the responsibility for discussions in decision making for PEG placement.

Keywords: Advanced dementia; Decision making; End of life; Enteral nutrition; Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG); Stroke.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. BMC Geriatr. 2007 Aug 17;7:22 - PubMed
    1. Lancet. 2005 Feb 26-Mar 4;365(9461):764-72 - PubMed
    1. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2016 Nov;25(11):2694-2700 - PubMed
    1. Clin Med (Lond). 2011 Apr;11(2):132-7 - PubMed
    1. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2017 Mar;17(3):487-493 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources