Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jun;23(6):807-813.
doi: 10.1007/s10157-019-01710-z. Epub 2019 Feb 27.

Impact of distance between donor and recipient hospitals on cadaveric kidney transplantation outcomes

Affiliations

Impact of distance between donor and recipient hospitals on cadaveric kidney transplantation outcomes

Itsuto Hamano et al. Clin Exp Nephrol. 2019 Jun.

Abstract

Background: The impact of distance between donor and recipient hospitals on outcomes in cadaveric kidney transplantations is unknown. We investigated the association between inter-hospital distance and outcomes in cadaveric kidney transplantations in Japan.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 363 cadaveric kidney transplantations between 2002 and 2017 in Japan. Inter-hospital distance, graft transport time, total ischemic time (TIT), and graft survival were compared between our hospital and national transplantation cohort in Japan. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) 1 month and 1 year after transplantation was compared between cadaveric and living-donor kidney transplantations in our hospitals. Additionally, inter-hospital distances among the seven geographical regions in Japan were assessed.

Results: There were 12 and 351 cadaveric kidney transplantations at our hospital and in Japan, respectively. Mean inter-hospital distance at our hospital (217 ± 121 km) was significantly longer than that of the national cohort (53 ± 80 km; P < 0.001). Mean TIT and graft survival for our hospital and national cohort were 539 ± 200 min and 91% and 491 ± 193 min and 81%, respectively. Mean eGFRs 1 year after cadaveric and living-donor transplantations at our hospitals were comparable (47 ± 16 vs. 47 ± 15 mL/min/1.73 m2). The comparison among seven regions in Japan indicated a regional difference in inter-hospital distance with an association between area (km2) and inter-hospital distance (km).

Conclusions: Despite the longer inter-hospital distance at our hospital, TIT and transplant outcomes were acceptable in our cases. In addition, geographical inequity in graft allocation in Japan was suggested.

Keywords: Cadaveric kidney transplantation; Geographical factors; Total ischemic time; Transport distance; Transport time.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. N Engl J Med. 2001 Oct 25;345(17):1237-42 - PubMed
    1. Kidney Int. 2004 Feb;65(2):713-8 - PubMed
    1. Nephrology (Carlton). 2006 Feb;11(1):73-7 - PubMed
    1. Transplantation. 2006 Dec 15;82(11):1425-8 - PubMed
    1. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2008 Mar;23(3):1054-60 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources