Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jul 10;37(20):1753-1774.
doi: 10.1200/JCO.18.01921. Epub 2019 Feb 27.

Management of the Neck in Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Oral Cavity and Oropharynx: ASCO Clinical Practice Guideline

Shlomo A Koyfman  1 , Nofisat Ismaila  2 , Doug Crook  3 , Anil D'Cruz  4 , Cristina P Rodriguez  5 , David J Sher  6 , Damian Silbermins  7 , Erich M Sturgis  8 , Terance T Tsue  9 , Jared Weiss  10 , Sue S Yom  11 , F Christopher Holsinger  12
Affiliations

Management of the Neck in Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Oral Cavity and Oropharynx: ASCO Clinical Practice Guideline

Shlomo A Koyfman et al. J Clin Oncol. .

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of the current work is to provide evidence-based recommendations to practicing physicians and others on the management of the neck in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity and oropharynx.

Methods: ASCO convened an Expert Panel of medical oncology, surgery, radiation oncology, and advocacy experts to conduct a literature search, which included systematic reviews, meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, and prospective and retrospective comparative observational studies published from 1990 through 2018. Outcomes of interest included survival, regional disease control, neck recurrence, and quality of life. Expert Panel members used available evidence and informal consensus to develop evidence-based guideline recommendations.

Results: The literature search identified 124 relevant studies to inform the evidence base for this guideline. Six clinical scenarios were devised; three for oral cavity cancer and three for oropharynx cancer, and recommendations were generated for each one.

Recommendations: For oral cavity cancers, clinical scenarios focused on the indications for and the hallmarks of a high-quality neck dissection, indications for postoperative radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy, and whether radiotherapy alone is sufficient elective treatment of an undissected neck compared with high-quality neck dissection. For oropharynx cancers, clinical scenarios focused on hallmarks of a high-quality neck dissection, factors that would favor operative versus nonoperative primary management, and clarifying criteria for an incomplete response to definitive chemoradiation for which salvage neck dissection would be recommended. Consensus was reached and recommendations were made for all six clinical scenarios. Additional information is available at www.asco.org/head-neck-cancer-guidelines .

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Authors’ disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.

Figures

FIG 1.
FIG 1.
PRISMA 2009 flow diagram. MA, meta-analysis; SR, systematic review.
FIG 2.
FIG 2.
Treatment algorithm for management of the neck in patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the head and neck. cN0, clinically node negative; cn+, clinically node positive; END, elective neck dissection; pN1, single pathologically node positive.
FIG 3.
FIG 3.
Treatment algorithm for management of the neck in patients with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. cN+, clinically node positive; CT, computed tomography; FDG, fluorodeoxyglucose; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; PET, positron emission tomography.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

  • ASCO Neck Dissection Guidelines Response Letter.
    Schilling C, Lai SY, Chegini S, McGurk M. Schilling C, et al. J Oncol Pract. 2019 Oct;15(10):560-561. doi: 10.1200/JOP.19.00331. Epub 2019 Sep 12. J Oncol Pract. 2019. PMID: 31513477 No abstract available.

References

    1. Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, et al. Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015;65:87–108. - PubMed
    1. Schuller DE, McGuirt WF, McCabe BF, et al. The prognostic significance of metastatic cervical lymph nodes. Laryngoscope. 1980;90:557–570. - PubMed
    1. D’Cruz AK, Vaish R, Kapre N, et al. Elective versus therapeutic neck dissection in node-negative oral cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:521–529. - PubMed
    1. O’Sullivan B, Huang SH, Su J, et al. Development and validation of a staging system for HPV-related oropharyngeal cancer by the International Collaboration on Oropharyngeal cancer Network for Staging (ICON-S): A multicentre cohort study. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17:440–451. - PubMed
    1. Sturgis EM, Cinciripini PM. Trends in head and neck cancer incidence in relation to smoking prevalence: An emerging epidemic of human papillomavirus-associated cancers? Cancer. 2007;110:1429–1435. - PubMed