Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Feb 5;9(2):e020515.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020515.

Patients and informal caregivers' experiences of burden of treatment in lung cancer and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): a systematic review and synthesis of qualitative research

Affiliations

Patients and informal caregivers' experiences of burden of treatment in lung cancer and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): a systematic review and synthesis of qualitative research

Kate Alice Lippiett et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objective: To identify, characterise and explain common and specific features of the experience of treatment burden in relation to patients living with lung cancer or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and their informal caregivers.

Design: Systematic review and interpretative synthesis of primary qualitative studies. Papers were analysed using constant comparison and directed qualitative content analysis.

Data sources: CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE, PsychINFO, Scopus and Web of Science searched from January 2006 to December 2015.

Eligibility criteria for selecting studies: Primary qualitative studies in English where participants were patients with lung cancer or COPD and/or their informal caregivers, aged >18 years that contain descriptions of experiences of interacting with health or social care in Europe, North America and Australia.

Results: We identified 127 articles with 1769 patients and 491 informal caregivers. Patients, informal caregivers and healthcare professionals (HCPs) acknowledged lung cancer's existential threat. Managing treatment workload was a priority in this condition, characterised by a short illness trajectory. Treatment workload was generally well supported by an immediacy of access to healthcare systems and a clear treatment pathway. Conversely, patients, informal caregivers and HCPs typically did not recognise or understand COPD. Treatment workload was balanced with the demands of everyday life throughout a characteristically long illness trajectory. Consequently, treatment workload was complicated by difficulties of access to, and navigation of, healthcare systems, and a fragmented treatment pathway. In both conditions, patients' capacity to manage workload was enhanced by the support of family and friends, peers and HCPs and diminished by illness/smoking-related stigma and social isolation.

Conclusion: This interpretative synthesis has affirmed significant differences in treatment workload between lung cancer and COPD. It has demonstrated the importance of the capacity patients have to manage their workload in both conditions. This suggests a workload which exceeds capacity may be a primary driver of treatment burden.

Prospero registration number: CRD42016048191.

Keywords: chronic airways disease; emphysema; respiratory tract tumours; thoracic medicine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: KAL reports grants from The Health Foundation, non-financial support from NIHR CLAHRC Wessex, during the conduct of the study; personal fees from Glaxo Smith Kline, grants and personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, personal fees from Teva, outside the submitted work.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA flowchart for COPD articles. CHF, congestive heart failure; CKD, chronic kidney disease; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; PRISMA, Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses; RATS, Relevance, Appropriateness, Transparency, Soundness.
Figure 2
Figure 2
PRISMA flowchart for lung cancer articles. PRISMA, Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses; RATS, Relevance, Appropriateness, Transparency, Soundness.

References

    1. May CR, Eton DT, Boehmer K, et al. . Rethinking the patient: using burden of treatment theory to understand the changing dynamics of illness. BMC Health Serv Res 2014;14:281 10.1186/1472-6963-14-281 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Demain S, Gonçalves AC, Areia C, et al. . Living with, managing and minimising treatment burden in long term conditions: a systematic review of qualitative research. PLoS One 2015;10:e0125457 10.1371/journal.pone.0125457 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Boehmer KR, Gionfriddo MR, Rodriguez-Gutierrez R, et al. . Patient capacity and constraints in the experience of chronic disease: a qualitative systematic review and thematic synthesis. BMC Fam Pract 2016;17:127 10.1186/s12875-016-0525-9 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Shippee ND, Shah ND, May CR, et al. . Cumulative complexity: a functional, patient-centered model of patient complexity can improve research and practice. J Clin Epidemiol 2012;65:1041–51. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.05.005 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Vassilev I, Rogers A, Kennedy A, et al. . The influence of social networks on self-management support: a metasynthesis. BMC Public Health 2014;14:719 10.1186/1471-2458-14-719 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types