Comparison of effectiveness between complete internal limiting membrane peeling and internal limiting membrane peeling with preservation of the central fovea in combination with 25G vitrectomy for the treatment of high myopic foveoschisis
- PMID: 30817612
- PMCID: PMC6831247
- DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000014710
Comparison of effectiveness between complete internal limiting membrane peeling and internal limiting membrane peeling with preservation of the central fovea in combination with 25G vitrectomy for the treatment of high myopic foveoschisis
Abstract
Vitrectomy combined with internal limiting membrane peeling (ILMP) treats high myopic foveoschisis with good results, but there is a risk of iatrogenic macular holes, which may be reduced by preserving the internal limiting membrane of the central fovea. This study compared complete ILMP with partial ILMP, both combined with 25G vitrectomy, for the treatment of high myopic foveoschisis.Thirty-three cases (33 eyes) of high myopic foveoschisis were retrospectively analyzed. They underwent 25G vitrectomy combined with C3F8 gas filling; Group A (20 patients, 20 eyes) underwent complete ILMP, while Group B (13 patients, 13 eyes) underwent partial ILMP to preserve the internal limiting membrane of the central fovea. Patients were followed up for 6 months and underwent best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), intraocular pressure, diopter, slit lamp microscopy, indirect ophthalmoscope, A-mode and/or B-mode ultrasound, and optical coherence tomography. Surgical complications were recorded.Up to the last follow-up, the BCVA improved and central fovea thickness (CFT) was lower compared with before surgery in both groups (All P < .05). There were no significant differences in BCVA and CFT at each time point between the groups (P > .05). Most of the postoperative retinas of the 2 groups were completely reattached, with disappearance of the macular retinoschisis cavity. Two patients in the Group A and none in the Group B developed a macular hole during follow-up (P = .508).The results did not support the superiority of partial ILMP over complete ILMP in reduced incidence of macular hole. Both methods had a similar curative effect.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Vitrectomy with or without internal limiting membrane peeling for myopic foveoschisis.BMC Ophthalmol. 2020 Mar 4;20(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s12886-020-01354-8. BMC Ophthalmol. 2020. PMID: 32131776 Free PMC article.
-
Fovea-sparing internal limiting membrane peeling versus complete internal limiting membrane peeling for myopic traction maculopathy.Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2020 Jan;64(1):13-21. doi: 10.1007/s10384-019-00696-1. Epub 2019 Nov 4. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2020. PMID: 31686266
-
Efficiency comparison with fovea-sparing internal limiting membrane peeling and complete internal limiting membrane peeling for treating myopic traction maculopathy.Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2022 Jan;260(1):73-81. doi: 10.1007/s00417-021-05320-y. Epub 2021 Jul 26. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2022. PMID: 34309768
-
Comparison between Fovea-Sparing and Complete Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling for the Treatment of Myopic Traction Maculopathy: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis.Ophthalmic Res. 2021;64(6):916-927. doi: 10.1159/000519021. Epub 2021 Aug 23. Ophthalmic Res. 2021. PMID: 34425571
-
Fovea-Sparing as Opposed to Total Peeling of Internal Limiting Membrane for Myopic Foveoschisis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Ophthalmol Retina. 2021 Jul;5(7):670-679. doi: 10.1016/j.oret.2020.10.010. Epub 2020 Dec 9. Ophthalmol Retina. 2021. PMID: 33307217
Cited by
-
Vitrectomy With Silicone Oil Tamponade and Without Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling for the Treatment of Myopic Foveoschisis With High Risk of Macular Hole Development.Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 May 28;8:648540. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.648540. eCollection 2021. Front Med (Lausanne). 2021. PMID: 34124090 Free PMC article.
-
A novel surgical technique of internal limiting membrane peeling for high myopic foveoschisis: a wide range of whole piece consecutive peeling without preservation of epi-fovea.Int J Ophthalmol. 2022 Feb 18;15(2):284-290. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2022.02.14. eCollection 2022. Int J Ophthalmol. 2022. PMID: 35186689 Free PMC article.
-
Long-term outcome of pathologic myopic foveoschisis treated with posterior scleral reinforcement followed by vitrectomy.Int J Ophthalmol. 2022 Jun 18;15(6):975-982. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2022.06.16. eCollection 2022. Int J Ophthalmol. 2022. PMID: 35814900 Free PMC article.
-
Vitrectomy with or without internal limiting membrane peeling for myopic foveoschisis.BMC Ophthalmol. 2020 Mar 4;20(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s12886-020-01354-8. BMC Ophthalmol. 2020. PMID: 32131776 Free PMC article.
-
Exploring the Research Landscape of High Myopia: Trends, Contributors, and Key Areas of Focus.Med Sci Monit. 2023 Dec 19;29:e941670. doi: 10.12659/MSM.941670. Med Sci Monit. 2023. PMID: 38111192 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Takano M, Kishi S. Foveal retinoschisis and retinal detachment in severely myopic eyes with posterior staphyloma. Am J Ophthalmol 1999;128:472–6. - PubMed
-
- Benhamou N, Massin P, Haouchine B, et al. Macular retinoschisis in highly myopic eyes. Am J Ophthalmol 2002;133:794–800. - PubMed
-
- Baba T, Ohno-Matsui K, Futagami S, et al. Prevalence and characteristics of foveal retinal detachment without macular hole in high myopia. Am J Ophthalmol 2003;135:338–42. - PubMed
-
- Panozzo G, Mercanti A. Optical coherence tomography findings in myopic traction maculopathy. Arch Ophthalmol 2004;122:1455–60. - PubMed
-
- Wu PC, Chen YJ, Chen YH, et al. Factors associated with foveoschisis and foveal detachment without macular hole in high myopia. Eye (Lond) 2009;23:356–61. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources