Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2019 Feb 27;9(2):e024429.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024429.

Addressing cognitive impairment following stroke: systematic review and meta-analysis of non-randomised controlled studies of psychological interventions

Niamh A Merriman  1 , Eithne Sexton  1 , Grainne McCabe  2 , Mary E Walsh  1   3 , Daniela Rohde  1 , Ashleigh Gorman  1 , Isabelle Jeffares  1 , Nora-Ann Donnelly  4 , Niall Pender  5 , David J Williams  6   7 , Frances Horgan  3 , Frank Doyle  1 , Maev-Ann Wren  4 , Kathleen E Bennett  1 , Anne Hickey  1
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Addressing cognitive impairment following stroke: systematic review and meta-analysis of non-randomised controlled studies of psychological interventions

Niamh A Merriman et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objective: Cognitive impairment is a pervasive outcome of stroke, reported in over half of patients 6 months post-stroke and is associated with increased disability and a poorer quality of life. Despite the prevalence of post-stroke cognitive impairment, the efficacy of existing psychological interventions for the rehabilitation of cognitive impairment following stroke has yet to be established. The aim of this study is to identify psychological interventions from non-randomised studies that intended to improve post-stroke cognitive function and establish their efficacy.

Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis of non-randomised studies of psychological interventions addressing post-stroke cognitive impairment.

Data sources: Electronic searches were performed in the Pubmed, EMBASE and PsycINFO databases, the search dating from inception to February 2017.

Eligibility criteria: All non-randomised controlled studies and quasi-randomised controlled trials examining psychological interventions to improve cognitive function following stroke were included, such as feasibility studies, pilot studies, experimental studies, and quasi-experimental studies. The primary outcome was cognitive function. The prespecified secondary outcomes were functional abilities in daily life and quality of life.

Methods: The current meta-analyses combined the findings of seven controlled studies, examining the efficacy of psychological interventions compared with treatment-as-usual controls or active controls, and 13 one-group pre-post studies.

Results: Results indicated an overall small effect on cognition across the controlled studies (Hedges' g=0.38, 95% CI=0.06 to 0.7) and a moderate effect on cognition across the one-group pre-post studies (Hedges' g=0.51, 95% CI=0.3 to 0.73). Specific cognitive domains, such as memory and attention also demonstrated a benefit of psychological interventions.

Conclusions: This review provides support for the potential of psychological interventions to improve overall cognitive function post-stroke. Limitations of the study, in terms of risk of bias and quality of included studies, and future research directions are explored.

Prospero registration number: CRD42017069714.

Keywords: cognitive impairment; cognitive rehabilitation; meta-analysis; stroke; systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses flow chart of included studies. RCT, randomised controlled trial.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Forest plot of included controlled studies at study level.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Forest plot of included one-group pre–post studies at study level.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Feigin VL, Norrving B, Mensah GA. Global burden of stroke. Circ Res 2017;120:439–48. 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.308413 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tatemichi TK, Desmond DW, Stern Y, et al. . Cognitive impairment after stroke: frequency, patterns, and relationship to functional abilities. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1994;57:202–7. 10.1136/jnnp.57.2.202 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mellon L, Brewer L, Hall P, et al. . Cognitive impairment six months after ischaemic stroke: a profile from the ASPIRE-S study. BMC Neurol 2015;15:1–9. 10.1186/s12883-015-0288-2 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nys GM, van Zandvoort MJ, van der Worp HB, et al. . Early cognitive impairment predicts long-term depressive symptoms and quality of life after stroke. J Neurol Sci 2006;247:149–56. 10.1016/j.jns.2006.04.005 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Narasimhalu K, Ang S, De Silva DA, et al. . Severity of CIND and MCI predict incidence of dementia in an ischemic stroke cohort. Neurology 2009;73:1866–72. 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181c3fcb7 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types