Comment
doi: 10.1136/medethics-2019-105395.
Epub 2019 Feb 28.
Goldilocks and the two principles. A response to Gyngell et al
- PMID: 30819902
- DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2019-105395
Item in Clipboard
Comment
Goldilocks and the two principles. A response to Gyngell et al
J Med Ethics.
2019 Aug.
No abstract available
Keywords: ethics; genetic engineering; public policy; reproductive medicine; social control of science/technology.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: None declared.
Comment on
-
Moral reasons to edit the human genome: picking up from the Nuffield report.J Med Ethics. 2019 Aug;45(8):514-523. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2018-105084. Epub 2019 Jan 24. J Med Ethics. 2019. PMID: 30679191 Free PMC article.
Similar articles
-
Genome editing, Goldilocks and polygenic risk scores.J Med Ethics. 2019 Aug;45(8):530-531. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2019-105713. Epub 2019 Jul 26. J Med Ethics. 2019. PMID: 31350357 No abstract available.
-
Science and technology vs. ethics and morals.Bull Menninger Clin. 1973 Mar;37(2):149-63. Bull Menninger Clin. 1973. PMID: 4697255 No abstract available.
-
The moral argument for heritable genome editing requires an inappropriately deterministic view of genetics.J Med Ethics. 2019 Aug;45(8):526-527. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2019-105390. Epub 2019 Mar 12. J Med Ethics. 2019. PMID: 30862707
-
Ethics and technological advances: contributions of social work practice.Soc Work Health Care. 1990;15(2):5-17. doi: 10.1300/j010v15n02_02. Soc Work Health Care. 1990. PMID: 2094961 Review.
-
Personal meaning and ethics in engineering.Sci Eng Ethics. 2002 Oct;8(4):545-60. doi: 10.1007/s11948-002-0008-3. Sci Eng Ethics. 2002. PMID: 12501724 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
