Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Feb 18:5:25.
doi: 10.1186/s40814-019-0409-6. eCollection 2019.

Evaluation of a surgical supervision model in three African countries-protocol for a prospective mixed-methods controlled pilot trial

Chiara Pittalis  1 , Ruairi Brugha  1 , Gloria Crispino  2 , Leon Bijlmakers  3 , Gerald Mwapasa  4 , Chris Lavy  5 , Grace Le  5 , Mweene Cheelo  6 , John Kachimba  6 , Eric Borgstein  4 , Nyengo Mkandawire  4 , Adinan Juma  7 , Paul Marealle  8 , Kondo Chilonga  9 , Jakub Gajewski  10
Affiliations

Evaluation of a surgical supervision model in three African countries-protocol for a prospective mixed-methods controlled pilot trial

Chiara Pittalis et al. Pilot Feasibility Stud. .

Abstract

Background: District-level hospitals (DLHs) can play an important role in the delivery of essential surgical services for rural populations in sub-Saharan Africa if adequately prepared and supported. This article describes the protocol for the evaluation of the Scaling up Safe Surgery for District and Rural Populations in Africa (SURG-Africa) project which aims to strengthen the capacity in district-level hospitals (DLHs) in Malawi, Tanzania and Zambia to deliver safe, quality surgery. The intervention comprises a programme of quarterly supervisory visits to surgically active district-level hospitals by specialists from referral hospitals and the establishment of a mobile phone-based consultation network. The overall objective is to test and refine the model with a view to scaling up to national level.

Methods: This mixed-methods controlled pilot trial will test the feasibility of the proposed supervision model in making quality-assured surgery available at DLHs. Firstly, the study will conduct a quantitative assessment of surgical service delivery at district facilities, looking at hospital preparedness, capacity and productivity, and how these are affected by the intervention. Secondly, the study will monitor changes in referral patterns from DLHs to a higher level of care as a result of the intervention. Data on utilisation of the mobile based-support network will also be collected. The analysis will compare changes over time and between intervention and control hospitals. The third element of the study will involve a qualitative assessment to obtain a better understanding of the functionality of DLH surgical systems and how these have been influenced by the intervention. It will also provide further information on feasibility, impact and sustainability of the supervision model.

Discussion: We seek to test a model of district-level capacity building through regular supervision by specialists and mobile phone technology-supported consultations to make safe surgical services more accessible, equitable and sustainable for rural populations in the target countries. The results of this study will provide robust evidence to inform and guide local actors in the national scale-up of the supervision model. Lessons learned will be transferred to the wider region.

Keywords: Africa; Evaluation; Non-physician clinicians; Supervision; Surgery; Surgical training.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Ethical approval for this study was granted by the Research Ethics Committee (REC) of the Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, the project consortium lead, under approval no. REC 1417. In the implementation countries, ethical approval was received from the College of Medicine Research Ethics Committee in Malawi (approval no. P.05/17/2179), the University of Zambia Biomedical Research Ethics Committee (approval no. 005-05-17), the Kilimanjaro Christian Medical College Research Ethics and Review Committee (approval no. CRERC 2026) and the National Institute for Medical Research in Tanzania (approval no. NIMR/HQ/R.8a/Vol. IX/2600).Not applicable.The authors declare that they have no competing interests.Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Conceptual framework
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Study structure
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Debas HT, Gosselin R, McCord C, et al. Surgery. In: Dean TJ, et al., editors. Disease control priorities in developing countries. 2. New York: The World Bank and Oxford University Press; 2006.
    1. Luboga S, Macfarlane SB, Von Schreeb J, et al. Increasing access to surgical services in sub-Saharan Africa: priorities for national and international agencies recommended by the Bellagio Essential Surgery Group. PLoS Med. 2009;6:1–5. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000200. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ozgediz D, Riviello R. The “other” neglected diseases in global public health: surgical conditions in sub-Saharan Africa. PLoS Med. 2008;5:6. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0050121. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alkire BC, Raykar NP, Shrime MG, et al. Global access to surgical care: a modelling study. Lancet Glob Health. 2015;3:e316–e323. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(15)70115-4. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. O’Connell T, Rasanathan K, Chopra M. What does universal health coverage mean? Lancet. 2014;383:277–279. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60955-1. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources