Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jul;43(7):1777-1787.
doi: 10.1007/s00268-019-04966-4.

Trends in the Incidence, Treatment and Outcomes of Patients with Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma in the USA: Facility Type is Associated with Margin Status, Use of Lymphadenectomy and Overall Survival

Affiliations

Trends in the Incidence, Treatment and Outcomes of Patients with Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma in the USA: Facility Type is Associated with Margin Status, Use of Lymphadenectomy and Overall Survival

Lu Wu et al. World J Surg. 2019 Jul.

Abstract

Introduction: Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) remains an uncommon disease with a rising incidence worldwide. We sought to identify trends in therapeutic approaches and differences in patient outcomes based on facility types.

Methods: Between January 1, 2004, and December 31, 2015, a total of 27,120 patients with histologic diagnosis of ICC were identified in the National Cancer Database and were enrolled in this study.

Results: The incidence of ICC patients increased from 1194 in 2004 to 3821 in 2015 with an average annual increase of 4.16% (p < 0.001). Median survival of the cohort improved over the last 6 years of the study period (2004-2009: 8.05 months vs. 2010-2015: 9.49 months; p < 0.001). Among surgical patients (n = 5943, 21.9%), the incidence of R0 resection, lymphadenectomy and harvest of ≥6 lymph nodes increased over time (p < 0.001). Positive surgical margins (referent R0: R1, HR 1.49, 95% CI 1.24-1.79, p < 0.001) and treatment at community cancer centers (referent academic centers; HR 1.24, 95% CI 1.04-1.49, p = 0.023) were associated with a worse prognosis. Patients treated at academic centers had higher rates of R0 resection (72.4% vs. 67.7%; p = 0.006) and lymphadenectomy (55.6% vs. 49.5%, p = 0.009) versus community cancer centers. Overall survival was also better at academic versus community cancer programs (median OS: 11 months versus 6 months, respectively; p < 0.001).

Conclusions: The incidence of ICC has increased over the last 12 years in the USA with a moderate improvement in survival over time. Treatment at academic cancer centers was associated with higher R0 resection and lymphadenectomy rates, as well as improved OS for patients with ICC.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2018 Aug;7(4):270-276 - PubMed
    1. J Surg Oncol. 2014 Aug;110(2):163-70 - PubMed
    1. Ann Surg. 2010 Jul;252(1):107-14 - PubMed
    1. J Am Coll Surg. 2017 Mar;224(3):362-372 - PubMed
    1. J Gastrointest Surg. 2018 Jan;22(1):52-59 - PubMed

MeSH terms