Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Apr;14(2):70-82.
doi: 10.1007/s11899-019-00500-4.

Challenges and Strategies in the Management of Multiple Myeloma in the Elderly Population

Affiliations
Review

Challenges and Strategies in the Management of Multiple Myeloma in the Elderly Population

Saurabh Zanwar et al. Curr Hematol Malig Rep. 2019 Apr.

Abstract

Purpose of review: Approximately one half of the patient-population in multiple myeloma (MM) is > 70 years at diagnosis. Despite notable strides in the management and improved survival, MM remains incurable, with an increasing proportion of elderly patients comprising the relapsed-refractory cohort.

Recent findings: The arbitrary age cutoff at 65 years to define the elderly patient-population has evolved to a more nuanced categorization, incorporating a comprehensive assessment for determining frailty prior to commencing treatment. This step is critical in determining the therapy-intensity, including transplant-eligibility, to minimize toxicity. Dose-modifications are crucial, as the merits of continuous therapy are becoming evident in this patient-population. Bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (VRd) combination has emerged as standard of care for newly diagnosed MM. Fixed-duration Rd followed by reduced-dosed continuous R may be considered in select frail patients with standard-risk MM. Herein, we review the unique challenges encountered in elderly MM and discuss strategies for optimal management.

Keywords: Anti-myeloma therapy; Comorbidities; Frailty; Geriatric assessment; Supportive care; Toxicity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Curr Hematol Malig Rep. 2011 Jun;6(2):104-12 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Oncol. 2014 Feb 20;32(6):587-600 - PubMed
    1. Cancer. 2016 Jul 1;122(13):1971-3 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Oncol. 2010 May 1;28(13):2259-66 - PubMed
    1. JAMA. 2017 Jan 3;317(1):48-58 - PubMed

MeSH terms