Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Mar 1;21(3):e10736.
doi: 10.2196/10736.

eHealth Apps Replacing or Complementing Health Care Contacts: Scoping Review on Adverse Effects

Wilhelmina Josepha Maria Stevens  1 , Rob van der Sande  1 , Lilian J Beijer  1 , Maarten Gm Gerritsen, Willem Jj Assendelft  2
Affiliations

eHealth Apps Replacing or Complementing Health Care Contacts: Scoping Review on Adverse Effects

Wilhelmina Josepha Maria Stevens et al. J Med Internet Res. .

Abstract

Background: The use of eHealth has increased tremendously in recent years. eHealth is generally considered to have a positive effect on health care quality and to be a promising alternative to face-to-face health care contacts. Surprisingly little is known about possible adverse effects of eHealth apps.

Objective: We conducted a scoping review on empirical research into adverse effects of eHealth apps that aim to deliver health care at a distance. We investigated whether adverse effects were reported and the nature and quality of research into these possible adverse effects.

Methods: For this scoping review, we followed the five steps of Arksey and O'Malley's scoping review methodology. We searched specifically for studies into eHealth apps that replaced or complemented the face-to-face contact between a health professional and a patient in the context of treatment, health monitoring, or supporting self-management. Studies were included when eHealth and adverse effects were mentioned in the title or abstract and when empirical data on adverse effects were provided. All health conditions, with the exception of mental health conditions, all ages, and all sample sizes were included. We examined the literature published between December 2012 and August 2017 in the following databases: PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library. The methodological quality of the studies was assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) checklists.

Results: Our search identified 79 papers that were potentially relevant; 11 studies met our inclusion criteria after screening. These studies differed in many ways and the majority were characterized by small research populations and low study quality. Adverse effects are rarely subject to systematic scientific research. So far, information on real adverse effects is mainly limited to incidental reporting or as a bycatch from qualitative pilot studies. Despite the shortage of solid research, we found some indications of possible negative impact on patient-centeredness and efficiency, such as less transparency in the relationship between health professionals and patients and time-consuming work routines.

Conclusions: There is a lack of high-quality empirical research on adverse effects of eHealth apps that replace or complement face-to-face care. While the development of eHealth apps is ongoing, the knowledge with regard to possible adverse effects is limited. The available research often focuses on efficacy, added value, implementation issues, use, and satisfaction, whereas adverse effects are underexplored. A better understanding of possible adverse effects could be a starting point in improving the positive impact of eHealth-based health care delivery.

Keywords: adverse effects; eHealth; scoping review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study selection process. CINAHL: Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Boogerd EA, Arts T, Engelen LJ, van de Belt TH. "What is eHealth": Time for an update? JMIR Res Protoc. 2015 Mar 12;4(1):e29. doi: 10.2196/resprot.4065. http://www.researchprotocols.org/2015/1/e29/ v4i1e29 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Oh H, Rizo C, Enkin M, Jadad A. What is eHealth?: A systematic review of published definitions. World Hosp Health Serv. 2005;41(1):32–40. - PubMed
    1. van der Vaart R, Witting M, Riper H, Kooistra L, Bohlmeijer ET, van Gemert-Pijnen LJ. Blending online therapy into regular face-to-face therapy for depression: Content, ratio and preconditions according to patients and therapists using a Delphi study. BMC Psychiatry. 2014 Dec 14;14:355. doi: 10.1186/s12888-014-0355-z. https://bmcpsychiatry.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12888-014-0355-z s12888-014-0355-z - DOI - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Elbert NJ, van Os-Medendorp H, van Renselaar W, Ekeland AG, Hakkaart-van Roijen L, Raat H, Nijsten TE, Pasmans SG. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of ehealth interventions in somatic diseases: A systematic review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. J Med Internet Res. 2014 Apr 16;16(4):e110. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2790. http://www.jmir.org/2014/4/e110/ v16i4e110 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Taylor K. Connected Health: How Digital Technology is Transforming Health and Social Care. London, UK: Deloitte Centre for Health Solutions; 2015. [2019-01-22]. https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/uk/Documents/life-science... .

Publication types

MeSH terms